12.6 sec in total
1 sec
4.6 sec
7 sec
Visit estream.to now to see the best up-to-date Estream content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about estream.to
eStream - Free file upload service
Visit estream.toWe analyzed Estream.to page load time and found that the first response time was 1 sec and then it took 11.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
estream.to performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
37/100
10%
Value3.8 s
55/100
25%
Value3.8 s
84/100
10%
Value170 ms
92/100
30%
Value0.029
100/100
15%
Value3.9 s
89/100
10%
1014 ms
1194 ms
831 ms
749 ms
1062 ms
Our browser made a total of 10 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Estream.to, 70% (7 requests) were made to Static.escdn.co and 10% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Estream.to.
Page size can be reduced by 80.2 kB (13%)
598.7 kB
518.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Estream.to main page is 598.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 476.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 3.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.2 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.6 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Estream images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 76.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 76.6 kB or 66% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (38%)
8
5
The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Estream. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
estream.to
1014 ms
estream.to
1194 ms
3style.css
831 ms
css
749 ms
jquery.min.js
1062 ms
xupload.js
911 ms
ddsmoothmenu.js
911 ms
1.js
893 ms
logo1.png
183 ms
home.jpg
816 ms
estream.to accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
estream.to best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
estream.to SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Estream.to can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Estream.to main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
estream.to
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Estream. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: