2.9 sec in total
166 ms
2.2 sec
566 ms
Click here to check amazing Everlight Radiology content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about everlightradiology.com
Improve the speed & accuracy of radiology reporting with 400 certified specialists from around the world. 350+ hospitals already trust our teleradiology.
Visit everlightradiology.comWe analyzed Everlightradiology.com page load time and found that the first response time was 166 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
everlightradiology.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value5.5 s
19/100
25%
Value7.1 s
31/100
10%
Value1,170 ms
21/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value14.9 s
8/100
10%
166 ms
77 ms
75 ms
60 ms
99 ms
Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Everlightradiology.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to No-cache.hubspot.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Insights.everlightradiology.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Insights.everlightradiology.com.
Page size can be reduced by 106.3 kB (4%)
2.6 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Everlightradiology.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 92.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 969 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Everlight Radiology images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 6.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 6.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Everlightradiology.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.9 kB or 18% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (57%)
70
30
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Everlight Radiology. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.everlightradiology.com
166 ms
jquery-1.7.1.js
77 ms
main.min.css
75 ms
theme-overrides.css
60 ms
module_173318595673_Everlight_-_Global_Header.css
99 ms
module_173333954129_Language_Switcher_Options.min.css
96 ms
jquery_mb_YTPlayer_min.min.css
66 ms
module_175468720224_hd-hero-banner-v2.min.css
107 ms
module_-35056501883_Video.min.css
99 ms
jquery_YTPlayer_min.min.css
110 ms
magnific-popup.min.css
117 ms
slick-slider.min.css
136 ms
slick-theme.min.css
123 ms
module_170768752718_hd-learning-slider.min.css
127 ms
module_173408168793_Everlight_-_Global_Footer.min.css
148 ms
v4.js
46 ms
video-render.min.js
160 ms
current.js
176 ms
embed.js
57 ms
main.min.js
189 ms
project.js
187 ms
jquery_waypoints_min.min.js
221 ms
bigSlide.min.js
214 ms
module_173318595673_Everlight_-_Global_Header.min.js
214 ms
jquery_mb_YTPlayer_min.min.js
220 ms
module_-35056501883_Video.min.js
131 ms
loader.js
88 ms
jquery-magnific-popup.min.js
219 ms
jquery_YTPlayer_min.min.js
229 ms
jquery_waypoints_min.min.js
234 ms
slick.min.js
234 ms
module_170768752718_hd-learning-slider.min.js
278 ms
4046287.js
318 ms
index.js
278 ms
gr
135 ms
hotjar-1541563.js
166 ms
c4acc2b7-7813-4c11-84dc-04c36b2f97b1.png
162 ms
42aeb3ee-25f6-4646-9243-75430a7c8db5.png
221 ms
81a3dfee-642a-4488-a30f-c95db4db78e9.png
262 ms
7eaa5f36-ac2f-40fa-8275-6757ff2f93ad.png
309 ms
c9aec695-f15e-4649-b993-6cfa5bf8ce04.png
261 ms
3f4578b9-adb5-4abe-b840-40e84cc378c6.png
264 ms
icon-phone_%23fff.svg
220 ms
icon-search_%23fff.svg
188 ms
Logo%20(1).png
158 ms
New%20Homepage%20banner.jpg
196 ms
PJP-44.jpg
1169 ms
EL_icon_0724_5PatientCasesReportedAnnually.png
440 ms
EL_icon_0724_36FastTrackBacklogReporting%20%20.png
228 ms
EL_icon_0724_10UnrivalledCapacity.png
542 ms
everlearning%20email%20banner.jpg
480 ms
Practical%20Case%20Based%20Review%20Abdomino-Pelvic%20Bleeding%20%E2%80%93%20Diagnostic%20tips%20and%20Management%20(1)-1.jpg
269 ms
Imaging%20Gunshot%20Wounds%20(4).jpg
280 ms
MRI%20in%20Rectal%20Cancer%20(3).jpg
317 ms
BVCER_SansQR-ISO%2027001-1.png
315 ms
BVCER_SansQR-ISO%209001.png
369 ms
RANZCR_NATA%20Accreditation%20(3).png
349 ms
CQC%20inspected%20and%20rated%20good.jpg
406 ms
QSI%20Cert%20-%2024.jpg
475 ms
GM%20Form%20Main.png
467 ms
Practical%20Case%20Based%20Review%20Abdomino-Pelvic%20Bleeding%20%E2%80%93%20Diagnostic%20tips%20and%20Management%20%281%29-1.jpg
474 ms
Imaging%20Gunshot%20Wounds%20%284%29.jpg
490 ms
MRI%20in%20Rectal%20Cancer%20%283%29.jpg
505 ms
decima_pro_light-webfont.woff
852 ms
decima_pro_bold-webfont.woff
407 ms
decima_pro-webfont.woff
684 ms
decima_pro_light-webfont.woff
625 ms
regular.woff
454 ms
decima_pro_bold-webfont.woff
1445 ms
decima_pro-webfont.woff
1029 ms
4046287.js
191 ms
collectedforms.js
185 ms
4046287.js
158 ms
conversations-embed.js
105 ms
web-interactives-embed.js
137 ms
leadflows.js
110 ms
fb.js
105 ms
globe-white.png
54 ms
everlightradiology.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
everlightradiology.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
everlightradiology.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Everlightradiology.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Everlightradiology.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
everlightradiology.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Everlight Radiology. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: