Tools & Wizards About Us
excelinspections.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    59% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

excelinspections.com

HOME — Excel Inspections

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

167 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

163 ms

excelinspections.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Excel Inspections content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about excelinspections.com

Visit excelinspections.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Excelinspections.com page load time and found that the first response time was 167 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

excelinspections.com performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

69/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.9 s

47/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value780 ms

38/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.014

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.7 s

22/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

excelinspections.com

167 ms

excelinspections.com

937 ms

css

41 ms

basic.min.css

72 ms

theme-ie11.min.css

177 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Excelinspections.com, 12% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (937 ms) belongs to the original domain Excelinspections.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 139.8 kB (36%)

Content Size

389.4 kB

After Optimization

249.6 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Excelinspections.com main page is 389.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 220.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 138.7 kB

  • Original 169.0 kB
  • After minification 165.7 kB
  • After compression 30.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 138.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.0 kB

  • Original 220.3 kB
  • After minification 220.3 kB
  • After compression 219.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (83%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Excel Inspections. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

excelinspections.com

excelinspections.com

167 ms

excelinspections.com

excelinspections.com

937 ms

css

css

41 ms

basic.min.css

basic.min.css

72 ms

theme-ie11.min.css

theme-ie11.min.css

177 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

176 ms

style.css

style.css

190 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

277 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

210 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

212 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

354 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

235 ms

js

js

66 ms

et-core-unified-11.min.css

et-core-unified-11.min.css

251 ms

scripts.min.js

scripts.min.js

359 ms

api.js

api.js

37 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

354 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

354 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

354 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

355 ms

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

jquery.maskedinput.min.js

354 ms

placeholders.jquery.min.js

placeholders.jquery.min.js

361 ms

vendor-theme.min.js

vendor-theme.min.js

355 ms

scripts-theme.min.js

scripts-theme.min.js

381 ms

frontend-legacy.min.js

frontend-legacy.min.js

403 ms

common.js

common.js

420 ms

sticky-elements.js

sticky-elements.js

476 ms

excel-logo.webp

excel-logo.webp

128 ms

excel-home-inspection.webp

excel-home-inspection.webp

443 ms

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf

S6uyw4BMUTPHjxAwWw.ttf

16 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwaPHA.ttf

20 ms

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-v.ttf

S6u8w4BMUTPHh30AUi-v.ttf

25 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh6UVSwaPHA.ttf

28 ms

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHA.ttf

S6u9w4BMUTPHh50XSwaPHA.ttf

31 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

306 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

269 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

136 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

269 ms

et-divi-dynamic-tb-98-11-late.css

et-divi-dynamic-tb-98-11-late.css

175 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

89 ms

excel-logo.webp

excel-logo.webp

70 ms

Accessibility Review

excelinspections.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

excelinspections.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

excelinspections.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Excelinspections.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Excelinspections.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

excelinspections.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Excel Inspections. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: