Tools & Wizards About Us
expedient.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

expedient.net

Cloud Computing and Data Center Infrastructure as a Service - Expedient

Page Load Speed

7.3 sec in total

First Response

215 ms

Resources Loaded

4.8 sec

Page Rendered

2.2 sec

expedient.net screenshot

About Website

Visit expedient.net now to see the best up-to-date Expedient content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about expedient.net

Expedient helps companies transform their IT operations through award-winning cloud solutions and managed services including disaster recovery, security and compliance, and more

Visit expedient.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Expedient.net page load time and found that the first response time was 215 ms and then it took 7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

expedient.net performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

19/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.1 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,970 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.4 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

expedient.net

215 ms

www.expedient.com

176 ms

www.expedient.com

435 ms

video-js.css

250 ms

tailwind.css

551 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Expedient.net, 33% (25 requests) were made to Expedient.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source C.6sc.co.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 790.6 kB (56%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

623.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Expedient.net main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 545.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 123.7 kB

  • Original 150.3 kB
  • After minification 110.8 kB
  • After compression 26.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 39.5 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 123.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 82.9 kB

  • Original 545.3 kB
  • After minification 462.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Expedient needs image optimization as it can save up to 82.9 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 108.8 kB

  • Original 218.8 kB
  • After minification 218.8 kB
  • After compression 110.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 108.8 kB or 50% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-95%

Potential reduce by 475.2 kB

  • Original 499.7 kB
  • After minification 207.9 kB
  • After compression 24.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Expedient.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 475.2 kB or 95% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (60%)

Requests Now

73

After Optimization

29

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Expedient. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

expedient.net

expedient.net

215 ms

www.expedient.com

www.expedient.com

176 ms

www.expedient.com

www.expedient.com

435 ms

video-js.css

video-js.css

250 ms

tailwind.css

tailwind.css

551 ms

css2

css2

285 ms

f7e98d7748.js

f7e98d7748.js

316 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

283 ms

index.css

index.css

148 ms

main.js

main.js

121 ms

popper.min.js

popper.min.js

21 ms

index.all.min.js

index.all.min.js

31 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

261 ms

tracking.js

tracking.js

542 ms

hotjar-2844445.js

hotjar-2844445.js

674 ms

exp-featured-mc.svg

exp-featured-mc.svg

183 ms

exp-featured-dr.svg

exp-featured-dr.svg

225 ms

exp-featured-vdi.svg

exp-featured-vdi.svg

518 ms

index-left.png

index-left.png

519 ms

index-right.png

index-right.png

634 ms

Expedient_CloudDifferent-Clouds_v2.png

Expedient_CloudDifferent-Clouds_v2.png

633 ms

EXP_BobEvans-Farms.png

EXP_BobEvans-Farms.png

633 ms

uop-bw.png

uop-bw.png

632 ms

EXP_Prodigo-1.png

EXP_Prodigo-1.png

632 ms

EXP_Stanley-Steemer.png

EXP_Stanley-Steemer.png

633 ms

ph_Containers.jpg

ph_Containers.jpg

777 ms

ph_DataTraffic.jpg

ph_DataTraffic.jpg

776 ms

ph_ContainersLong.jpg

ph_ContainersLong.jpg

1174 ms

EXP-Enterprisecloud-tb.png

EXP-Enterprisecloud-tb.png

757 ms

EXP_MdLogix.png

EXP_MdLogix.png

775 ms

EXP_Prodigo.png

EXP_Prodigo.png

757 ms

GartnerPeerInsights.png

GartnerPeerInsights.png

1172 ms

ico_cloud.svg

ico_cloud.svg

1172 ms

703465973

703465973

1084 ms

ctaArrow.svg

ctaArrow.svg

1081 ms

bg_arrow.svg

bg_arrow.svg

949 ms

ph_arrow2.svg

ph_arrow2.svg

830 ms

conversion_async.js

conversion_async.js

757 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

375 ms

insight.min.js

insight.min.js

339 ms

iframe_api

iframe_api

711 ms

cookieconsent.min.css

cookieconsent.min.css

454 ms

cookieconsent.min.js

cookieconsent.min.js

868 ms

Z5WuRBQOf18FfxBIPrSs

Z5WuRBQOf18FfxBIPrSs

709 ms

6si.min.js

6si.min.js

1026 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

452 ms

counter.js

counter.js

506 ms

uwt.js

uwt.js

866 ms

modules.2be88a2123e5e486752f.js

modules.2be88a2123e5e486752f.js

869 ms

details

details

251 ms

collect

collect

458 ms

collect

collect

1159 ms

collect

collect

576 ms

player.js

player.js

1158 ms

player.css

player.css

1030 ms

vuid.min.js

vuid.min.js

1056 ms

1008852579547252

1008852579547252

224 ms

www-widgetapi.js

www-widgetapi.js

224 ms

209 ms

736 ms

box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html

box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html

778 ms

t.php

t.php

1242 ms

collect

collect

650 ms

getuidj

getuidj

1227 ms

c.6sc.co

c.6sc.co

1249 ms

img.gif

img.gif

1077 ms

adsct

adsct

870 ms

adsct

adsct

874 ms

719 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

662 ms

664 ms

1429106849-720965d98743af5dfc826d953fe0de8aaaedd3d7c1d739f32c8f8ca37e21eb7e-d

1429106849-720965d98743af5dfc826d953fe0de8aaaedd3d7c1d739f32c8f8ca37e21eb7e-d

597 ms

img.gif

img.gif

198 ms

17 ms

pd.js

pd.js

213 ms

collect

collect

22 ms

Accessibility Review

expedient.net accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

expedient.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

expedient.net SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Expedient.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Expedient.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

expedient.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Expedient. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: