Access extract.digital. Specialists in Analytics | Digital Marketing Agency

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

55/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.0 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,270 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.519

15/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.6 s

4/100

10%

extract.digital

179 ms

LivIconsEvo.WP.css

1226 ms

LivIconsEvo.custom.css

1023 ms

styles.css

1034 ms

rs6.css

267 ms

Our browser made a total of 128 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Extract.digital, 63% (81 requests) were made to 80800-223004-raikfcquaxqncofqfm.stackpathdns.com and 21% (27 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) relates to the external source 80800-223004-raikfcquaxqncofqfm.stackpathdns.com.

Content Size

774.4 kB

After Optimization

610.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Extract.digital main page is 774.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 345.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 75.6 kB

Original 87.0 kB
After minification 65.0 kB
After compression 11.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 22.1 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.6 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

Original 154.0 kB
After minification 154.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Extract images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 37.3 kB

Original 345.2 kB
After minification 343.8 kB
After compression 307.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 37.3 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 50.7 kB

Original 188.1 kB
After minification 187.8 kB
After compression 137.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Extract.digital needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 50.7 kB or 27% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Extract. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 59 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

High

Links do not have descriptive text

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Links are not crawlable

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

EN
Language Claimed

EN
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Extract.digital can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Extract.digital main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

extract.digital

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Extract. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Specialists in Analytics | Digital Marketing Agency | Extract Digital

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Network Requests Diagram

extract.digital

LivIconsEvo.WP.css

LivIconsEvo.custom.css

styles.css

rs6.css

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Content Size

After Optimization

HTML Optimization

Image Optimization

JavaScript Optimization

CSS Optimization

Requests Breakdown

Requests Now

After Optimization

Network Requests Diagram

extract.digital

LivIconsEvo.WP.css

LivIconsEvo.custom.css

styles.css

rs6.css

style.css

plugins.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

style.min.css

ionicons.min.css

style.css

simple-line-icons.css

dripicons.css

blog.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

modules.min.css

modules-responsive.min.css

blog-responsive.min.css

style_dynamic_responsive.php

style_dynamic.php

js_composer.min.css

css

css

LivIconsEvo.WP.tools.js

LivIconsEvo.WP.defaults.js

LivIconsEvo.WP.min.js

LivIconsEvo.custom.js

scripts.js

api.js

gtm4wp-contact-form-7-tracker.js

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

core.min.js

widget.min.js

tabs.min.js

accordion.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

jquery.appear.js

modernizr.custom.85257.js

hoverIntent.min.js

jquery.plugin.js

jquery.countdown.min.js

js