5 sec in total
179 ms
4.3 sec
492 ms
Visit extract.digital now to see the best up-to-date Extract content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about extract.digital
We're Extract, a digital agency based in London. Specialising in Analytics, we use your data as the foundation of our digital marketing strategies.
Visit extract.digitalWe analyzed Extract.digital page load time and found that the first response time was 179 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
extract.digital performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
55/100
10%
Value16.6 s
0/100
25%
Value11.0 s
6/100
10%
Value2,270 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.519
15/100
15%
Value17.6 s
4/100
10%
179 ms
1226 ms
1023 ms
1034 ms
267 ms
Our browser made a total of 128 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Extract.digital, 63% (81 requests) were made to 80800-223004-raikfcquaxqncofqfm.stackpathdns.com and 21% (27 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) relates to the external source 80800-223004-raikfcquaxqncofqfm.stackpathdns.com.
Page size can be reduced by 163.6 kB (21%)
774.4 kB
610.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Extract.digital main page is 774.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 345.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 75.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 22.1 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.6 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Extract images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 37.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 37.3 kB or 11% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 50.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Extract.digital needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 50.7 kB or 27% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 79 (88%)
90
11
The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Extract. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 59 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
extract.digital
179 ms
LivIconsEvo.WP.css
1226 ms
LivIconsEvo.custom.css
1023 ms
styles.css
1034 ms
rs6.css
267 ms
style.css
225 ms
plugins.min.css
1971 ms
font-awesome.min.css
1009 ms
style.min.css
1736 ms
ionicons.min.css
1013 ms
style.css
1389 ms
simple-line-icons.css
1153 ms
dripicons.css
1768 ms
blog.min.css
1502 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
1359 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
1670 ms
modules.min.css
1401 ms
modules-responsive.min.css
1741 ms
blog-responsive.min.css
1642 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.php
129 ms
style_dynamic.php
143 ms
js_composer.min.css
1780 ms
css
94 ms
css
81 ms
LivIconsEvo.WP.tools.js
1850 ms
LivIconsEvo.WP.defaults.js
2109 ms
LivIconsEvo.WP.min.js
1736 ms
LivIconsEvo.custom.js
1861 ms
scripts.js
1852 ms
api.js
100 ms
gtm4wp-contact-form-7-tracker.js
2107 ms
gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js
2103 ms
core.min.js
2102 ms
widget.min.js
1867 ms
tabs.min.js
2106 ms
accordion.min.js
2106 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
2348 ms
jquery.appear.js
2349 ms
modernizr.custom.85257.js
2348 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
2347 ms
jquery.plugin.js
2467 ms
jquery.countdown.min.js
2347 ms
js
97 ms
rocket-loader.min.js
32 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
2312 ms
parallax.min.js
2239 ms
select2.min.js
1525 ms
easypiechart.js
1495 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
1490 ms
Chart.min.js
1709 ms
counter.js
1590 ms
absoluteCounter.js
1519 ms
fluidvids.min.js
1373 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
1352 ms
jquery.nicescroll.min.js
1310 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
1339 ms
TweenLite.min.js
1197 ms
TimelineLite.min.js
1372 ms
CSSPlugin.min.js
1132 ms
EasePack.min.js
1112 ms
jquery.mixitup.min.js
1082 ms
jquery.waitforimages.js
1192 ms
jquery.infinitescroll.min.js
1179 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
1102 ms
skrollr.js
1300 ms
bootstrapCarousel.js
1299 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
1187 ms
gtm.js
250 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
1245 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrc.woff
118 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrc.woff
252 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrc.woff
306 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrc.woff
306 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CGPrc.woff
306 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCGPrc.woff
305 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrc.woff
304 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCGPrc.woff
305 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCGPrc.woff
345 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1JlEw.woff
308 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1JlEw.woff
308 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1JlEw.woff
308 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1JlEw.woff
308 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1JlEw.woff
308 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedA.woff
382 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1JlEw.woff
385 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1JlEw.woff
382 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTufntG.woff
380 ms
modules.min.js
989 ms
blog.min.js
1358 ms
comment-reply.min.js
970 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
1090 ms
like.min.js
1120 ms
frontend.min.js
1398 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjMDr0fJg.woff
249 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4VrMDr0fJg.woff
256 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4TbMDr0fJg.woff
274 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4ejMDr0fJg.woff
276 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4WjNDr0fJg.woff
277 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4bbLDr0fJg.woff
275 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4Y_LDr0fJg.woff
273 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4ejLDr0fJg.woff
275 ms
1Pt_g8zYS_SKggPNyCgSQamb1W0lwk4S4cHLDr0fJg.woff
277 ms
optimize.js
216 ms
cookieconsent.min.css
251 ms
cookieconsent.min.js
276 ms
hotjar-469292.js
211 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1174 ms
linea-ecommerce-10.woff
1002 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1115 ms
linea-arrows-10.woff
1116 ms
linea-basic-elaboration-10.woff
1152 ms
linea-music-10.woff
1193 ms
linea-software-10.woff
1065 ms
linea-basic-10.woff
1107 ms
ElegantIcons.woff
1142 ms
logo.png
1114 ms
logo-white.png
1250 ms
analytics.js
31 ms
modules.cbd9768ba80ba0be5b17.js
158 ms
linkid.js
31 ms
box-69edcc3187336f9b0a3fbb4c73be9fe6.html
78 ms
transparent.png
1196 ms
5-reasons-hiring-digital-agency-value-money-min.jpg
1064 ms
12-reasons-to-use-analytics-for-your-business-min.jpg
1065 ms
collect
16 ms
collect
47 ms
visit-data
419 ms
jquery.js
15 ms
extract.digital accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
extract.digital best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
extract.digital SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Extract.digital can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Extract.digital main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
extract.digital
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Extract. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: