6.9 sec in total
913 ms
5.7 sec
195 ms
Welcome to eyecom.co.za homepage info - get ready to check Eyecom best content right away, or after learning these important things about eyecom.co.za
We understand LED – how it is best deployed to create and deliver captivating content and how to obtain the maximum value from it.
Visit eyecom.co.zaWe analyzed Eyecom.co.za page load time and found that the first response time was 913 ms and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
eyecom.co.za performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.1 s
9/100
10%
Value9.9 s
0/100
25%
Value11.6 s
4/100
10%
Value900 ms
31/100
30%
Value0.009
100/100
15%
Value13.7 s
11/100
10%
913 ms
1312 ms
69 ms
330 ms
43 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Eyecom.co.za, 5% (2 requests) were made to Stackpath.bootstrapcdn.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Eyecom.co.za.
Page size can be reduced by 49.0 kB (4%)
1.1 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Eyecom.co.za main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 783.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.5 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Eyecom images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eyecom.co.za has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (67%)
36
12
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eyecom. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
eyecom.co.za
913 ms
eyecom.co.za
1312 ms
js
69 ms
style.css
330 ms
bootstrap.min.css
43 ms
css2
49 ms
style.min.css
662 ms
style-index.css
953 ms
styles.css
961 ms
cookie-law-info-public.css
981 ms
cookie-law-info-gdpr.css
990 ms
jquery.min.js
1324 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
988 ms
cookie-law-info-public.js
1277 ms
popper.min.js
39 ms
bootstrap.min.js
50 ms
eye.js
1284 ms
cookie-law-info-table.css
1311 ms
hooks.min.js
1317 ms
i18n.min.js
1336 ms
index.js
1599 ms
index.js
1611 ms
custom.js
1639 ms
api.js
43 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1645 ms
index.js
1653 ms
eyecom-logo.svg
331 ms
the-art-of-visual-communication.jpg
1847 ms
what-we-do.jpg
2188 ms
our-projects.jpg
1928 ms
footer-logo-element.svg
645 ms
foot-logo.svg
659 ms
fb.svg
664 ms
li.svg
975 ms
fbevents.js
41 ms
down.svg
995 ms
serv-logo-element.svg
998 ms
recaptcha__en.js
24 ms
eyecom.co.za accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
eyecom.co.za best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
eyecom.co.za SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eyecom.co.za can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eyecom.co.za main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eyecom.co.za
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Eyecom. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: