Tools & Wizards About Us
eyesandart.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 46

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

eyesandart.net

An Optical Galleria – Eye care practice, optician, optometrist

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

177 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

889 ms

eyesandart.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to eyesandart.net homepage info - get ready to check Eye Sandart best content right away, or after learning these important things about eyesandart.net

Visit eyesandart.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Eyesandart.net page load time and found that the first response time was 177 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

eyesandart.net performance score

46

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

40/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

37/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value660 ms

45/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.127

82/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.2 s

32/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.eyesandart.net

177 ms

css2

32 ms

wpo-minify-header-5ed011f5.min.css

79 ms

js

95 ms

wpo-minify-footer-8f0c08f9.min.js

118 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Eyesandart.net, 5% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (181 ms) belongs to the original domain Eyesandart.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 83.5 kB (7%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Eyesandart.net main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 957.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 83.3 kB

  • Original 98.7 kB
  • After minification 98.4 kB
  • After compression 15.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 83.3 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 957.7 kB
  • After minification 957.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Eye Sandart images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 12 B

  • Original 78.0 kB
  • After minification 78.0 kB
  • After compression 78.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 242 B

  • Original 76.2 kB
  • After minification 76.2 kB
  • After compression 75.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eyesandart.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eye Sandart. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

www.eyesandart.net

www.eyesandart.net

177 ms

css2

css2

32 ms

wpo-minify-header-5ed011f5.min.css

wpo-minify-header-5ed011f5.min.css

79 ms

js

js

95 ms

wpo-minify-footer-8f0c08f9.min.js

wpo-minify-footer-8f0c08f9.min.js

118 ms

updatedlogo-1.png

updatedlogo-1.png

47 ms

banner-bg.png

banner-bg.png

41 ms

OpticalEaston1-e1532013236323.jpg

OpticalEaston1-e1532013236323.jpg

64 ms

secondcircle-adj.jpg

secondcircle-adj.jpg

91 ms

Billfisher-front-mt-gry-blu-mir-resized-1.jpg

Billfisher-front-mt-gry-blu-mir-resized-1.jpg

71 ms

Ovvowebsitenew-e1532013299406.jpg

Ovvowebsitenew-e1532013299406.jpg

70 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

170 ms

CaptAustinLR.jpg

CaptAustinLR.jpg

92 ms

BestOptician.webp

BestOptician.webp

130 ms

Eye-Exams-Eyeglass-Repairs-Replacements-OC-MD.jpg

Eye-Exams-Eyeglass-Repairs-Replacements-OC-MD.jpg

114 ms

Eye-Exams-Eyeglass-Replacements-Repairs-Centreville-MD.jpg

Eye-Exams-Eyeglass-Replacements-Repairs-Centreville-MD.jpg

181 ms

Eyeglasses-Repairs-Replacements-Easton-MD.jpg

Eyeglasses-Repairs-Replacements-Easton-MD.jpg

180 ms

footer-bg.png

footer-bg.png

115 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

34 ms

fa-light-300.woff

fa-light-300.woff

53 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

74 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

36 ms

Accessibility Review

eyesandart.net accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

eyesandart.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

eyesandart.net SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eyesandart.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eyesandart.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

eyesandart.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Eye Sandart. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: