Tools & Wizards About Us
ezeetask.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 80

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

ezeetask.com

Page Load Speed

7.9 sec in total

First Response

946 ms

Resources Loaded

6.7 sec

Page Rendered

285 ms

ezeetask.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ezeetask content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ezeetask.com

Manage your to-do list, assign tasks and get real-time updates on your projects with ezeetask. with EzeeTask you and your project team can quickly and easily set up new projects, assign and share tas...

Visit ezeetask.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ezeetask.com page load time and found that the first response time was 946 ms and then it took 6.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ezeetask.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value19.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.078

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.1 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ezeetask.com

946 ms

www.ezeetask.com

1545 ms

bootstrap.min.css

652 ms

normalize.css

839 ms

font-awesome.css

1260 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Ezeetask.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Ezeetask.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 473.7 kB (19%)

Content Size

2.5 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ezeetask.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 18.1 kB

  • Original 21.9 kB
  • After minification 14.8 kB
  • After compression 3.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.1 kB, which is 32% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 45.6 kB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ezeetask images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 175.8 kB

  • Original 257.2 kB
  • After minification 221.6 kB
  • After compression 81.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 175.8 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 234.3 kB

  • Original 277.5 kB
  • After minification 246.4 kB
  • After compression 43.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ezeetask.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 234.3 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (38%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

28

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ezeetask. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ezeetask.com

ezeetask.com

946 ms

www.ezeetask.com

www.ezeetask.com

1545 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

652 ms

normalize.css

normalize.css

839 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

1260 ms

owl.carousel.min.css

owl.carousel.min.css

881 ms

owl.theme.default.min.css

owl.theme.default.min.css

881 ms

animate.min.css

animate.min.css

1106 ms

webslidemenu.css

webslidemenu.css

1555 ms

style.css

style.css

1257 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

1319 ms

logo.png

logo.png

1105 ms

banner-1.png

banner-1.png

2641 ms

scroll.png

scroll.png

1320 ms

capablity-img.png

capablity-img.png

1872 ms

dashboard.png

dashboard.png

1672 ms

reports.png

reports.png

1965 ms

task_manag.png

task_manag.png

1539 ms

mobile.png

mobile.png

1760 ms

g-play.png

g-play.png

1773 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

2087 ms

webslidemenu.js

webslidemenu.js

1975 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

2216 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

2079 ms

wow.min.js

wow.min.js

2180 ms

function.js

function.js

2189 ms

mailconfig.js

mailconfig.js

2284 ms

js

js

48 ms

1.png

1.png

2328 ms

2.png

2.png

2425 ms

3.png

3.png

2424 ms

4.png

4.png

2439 ms

5.png

5.png

2490 ms

featured-laptop.png

featured-laptop.png

2501 ms

instance-msj.png

instance-msj.png

2611 ms

Captcha.ashx

Captcha.ashx

2664 ms

refresh.png

refresh.png

2658 ms

li.png

li.png

1140 ms

capablity-bg.png

capablity-bg.png

1157 ms

active-indicator.png

active-indicator.png

1271 ms

app-bg.png

app-bg.png

2612 ms

round.png

round.png

1327 ms

feature-list-img.png

feature-list-img.png

1323 ms

startgrowing-bg.png

startgrowing-bg.png

1554 ms

texgyreadventor-bold.woff

texgyreadventor-bold.woff

1333 ms

texgyreadventor-regular.woff

texgyreadventor-regular.woff

1669 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1512 ms

js

js

40 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

21 ms

collect

collect

43 ms

Accessibility Review

ezeetask.com accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

ezeetask.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

ezeetask.com SEO score

80

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ezeetask.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ezeetask.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ezeetask.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ezeetask. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: