Tools & Wizards About Us
fabricstaffing.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

fabricstaffing.com

Fabric Staffing | Find Recruiters and Jobs Near Me

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

15 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

fabricstaffing.com screenshot

About Website

Visit fabricstaffing.com now to see the best up-to-date Fabric Staffing content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about fabricstaffing.com

One of the best recruiting firms collaborating with early-stage startups and seed-to-series companies to connect with innovative and diverse talent.

Visit fabricstaffing.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Fabricstaffing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 15 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fabricstaffing.com performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.3 s

19/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,920 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.163

72/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.3 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fabricstaffing.com

15 ms

fabricstaffing.com

395 ms

js

278 ms

job-listings.css

15 ms

style.min.css

22 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Fabricstaffing.com, 14% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Fabricstaffing.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 353.8 kB (50%)

Content Size

701.3 kB

After Optimization

347.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Fabricstaffing.com main page is 701.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 391.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 352.1 kB

  • Original 391.6 kB
  • After minification 383.1 kB
  • After compression 39.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 352.1 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 28 B

  • Original 63.5 kB
  • After minification 63.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fabric Staffing images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 141 B

  • Original 174.8 kB
  • After minification 174.8 kB
  • After compression 174.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 71.4 kB
  • After minification 71.4 kB
  • After compression 69.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fabricstaffing.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (79%)

Requests Now

52

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 52 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fabric Staffing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

fabricstaffing.com

fabricstaffing.com

15 ms

fabricstaffing.com

fabricstaffing.com

395 ms

js

js

278 ms

job-listings.css

job-listings.css

15 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

22 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

24 ms

header-footer.min.css

header-footer.min.css

38 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

38 ms

post-5.css

post-5.css

33 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

34 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

36 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

33 ms

main.css

main.css

45 ms

global.css

global.css

45 ms

c61e37c699c7975e1b322d375d47d7e8.css

c61e37c699c7975e1b322d375d47d7e8.css

47 ms

post-7.css

post-7.css

42 ms

post-151.css

post-151.css

43 ms

dd1e60a6adb42136c8eea172658b36c9.css

dd1e60a6adb42136c8eea172658b36c9.css

43 ms

style.css

style.css

50 ms

88bcbedd3f35381ba68a65bfa704fda2.css

88bcbedd3f35381ba68a65bfa704fda2.css

51 ms

06a8a2727ca0151b2262272dbd7695bf.js

06a8a2727ca0151b2262272dbd7695bf.js

59 ms

js

js

273 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

414 ms

widget-nav-menu.min.css

widget-nav-menu.min.css

49 ms

widget-theme-elements.min.css

widget-theme-elements.min.css

49 ms

widget-icon-box.min.css

widget-icon-box.min.css

49 ms

widget-posts.min.css

widget-posts.min.css

53 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

51 ms

986552fcb7cb552def395d13e8b3b510.css

986552fcb7cb552def395d13e8b3b510.css

51 ms

fc9d832bdfaeacf4ee384e9c5751264d.js

fc9d832bdfaeacf4ee384e9c5751264d.js

230 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

231 ms

imagesloaded.min.js

imagesloaded.min.js

231 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

230 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

235 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

261 ms

f098e4fd9581b6131d11ffa169fe264f.js

f098e4fd9581b6131d11ffa169fe264f.js

260 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

263 ms

1b9a666e2c3e5a2f72e77ba5dba40766.js

1b9a666e2c3e5a2f72e77ba5dba40766.js

235 ms

48f998049cee8fb5bde3f6b002cda49f.js

48f998049cee8fb5bde3f6b002cda49f.js

260 ms

css

css

230 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

259 ms

5f8aeb055dca3cc56378acc3cf5c93be.js

5f8aeb055dca3cc56378acc3cf5c93be.js

260 ms

690db3fda7470a258004558623650063.js

690db3fda7470a258004558623650063.js

251 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

248 ms

fabric-black-sm.png

fabric-black-sm.png

40 ms

Fabric-Staffing-2022.mp4

Fabric-Staffing-2022.mp4

1553 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

41 ms

Group-343.jpg

Group-343.jpg

41 ms

lazy_placeholder.gif

lazy_placeholder.gif

38 ms

Group-343.png

Group-343.png

41 ms

Group-343-1.jpg

Group-343-1.jpg

41 ms

Group-343-2.jpg

Group-343-2.jpg

42 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

138 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

139 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

301 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEA.ttf

333 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtF.ttf

333 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

333 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

333 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf

331 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEA.ttf

332 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

194 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

193 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

458 ms

zrt_lookup_nohtml.html

zrt_lookup_nohtml.html

90 ms

ads

ads

25 ms

Accessibility Review

fabricstaffing.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

fabricstaffing.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

fabricstaffing.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fabricstaffing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fabricstaffing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

fabricstaffing.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fabric Staffing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: