6.7 sec in total
273 ms
5.4 sec
1 sec
Welcome to facecast.net homepage info - get ready to check Facecast best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about facecast.net
Профессиональная стриминговая платформа, оборудование для онлайн-трансляций конференций, вебинаров, ивентов, мастер-классов и видеохостинг.
Visit facecast.netWe analyzed Facecast.net page load time and found that the first response time was 273 ms and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
facecast.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value13.5 s
0/100
25%
Value11.1 s
5/100
10%
Value2,530 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.206
60/100
15%
Value20.1 s
2/100
10%
273 ms
834 ms
43 ms
164 ms
297 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (85 requests) were addressed to the original Facecast.net, 3% (3 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Code.jivosite.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Facecast.net.
Page size can be reduced by 113.8 kB (4%)
2.7 MB
2.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Facecast.net main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 90.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 25.4 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 90.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 695 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Facecast images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 9.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 13.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Facecast.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.5 kB or 16% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (51%)
87
43
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Facecast. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
facecast.net
273 ms
834 ms
css
43 ms
style.min.css
164 ms
classic-themes.min.css
297 ms
global.styles.css
500 ms
custom.css
519 ms
style.css
484 ms
support.css
490 ms
help-search.css
554 ms
aboutPlatform.css
511 ms
onlineTranslations.css
621 ms
videohosting.css
617 ms
solutions.css
631 ms
picturefill.min.js
643 ms
move-to-1.8.3.min.js
654 ms
jquery-3.4.1.min.js
724 ms
object-fit-polyfill-2.3.0.min.js
752 ms
hc-sticky-2.2.3.min.js
768 ms
jquery.slick-1.9.0.min.js
799 ms
isotope-3.0.6.min.js
785 ms
jquery.readmore-3.0.0.min.js
792 ms
jquery.form-validator.min.js
858 ms
jquery.izimodal-1.6.0.min.js
883 ms
form-action.js
904 ms
mail-send.js
919 ms
global.scripts.min.js
930 ms
script.js
929 ms
popper.js
988 ms
tippy.js
1027 ms
jquery.inputmask.js
1096 ms
jquery.query.js
1049 ms
common.js
1056 ms
aos-2.3.4.min.js
1067 ms
social-likes.min.js
108 ms
4W7VsLmb7D
255 ms
js
73 ms
gtm.js
80 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1112 ms
logo-1.svg
171 ms
logo-white.svg
166 ms
icon3.svg
242 ms
container.svg
167 ms
menuIcon_1.svg
162 ms
Content.svg
185 ms
Content4.svg
243 ms
menuIcon_2.svg
243 ms
menuIcon_4.svg
287 ms
menuIcon_7.svg
289 ms
menuIcon_8.svg
335 ms
menuIcon_9.svg
313 ms
loudW2.svg
331 ms
iPad-Air-1.png
420 ms
Macbook-Pro-16-mockup-2.png
505 ms
iPhone-14-Pro-mockup-1.png
428 ms
Code2.webp
460 ms
devs_2.png
533 ms
Player-4-1-1.webp
532 ms
devs_4.png
594 ms
playerIcon_1.svg
552 ms
playerIcon_2.svg
580 ms
playerIcon_3.svg
626 ms
playerIcon_4.svg
651 ms
Player-5-2.webp
690 ms
Player-6-1.webp
692 ms
Player-13-1.webp
779 ms
Player-16-1-1.webp
748 ms
wrg-1.webp
747 ms
telegramGray.png
779 ms
telegramBlue.svg
797 ms
vk.svg
813 ms
payments.png
866 ms
init
725 ms
triangle.svg
849 ms
arr.svg
894 ms
simple-menu.svg
742 ms
title.svg
747 ms
iPad-Air-2x-1.png
972 ms
Macbook-Pro-16-mockup-2x-1.png
970 ms
museosans-medium.otf
955 ms
tag.js
969 ms
2754.svg
87 ms
museosans-300.otf
1036 ms
museosans-bold.otf
1003 ms
iPhone-14-Pro-mockup-2x-1.png
815 ms
4W7VsLmb7D
184 ms
Code.png
1019 ms
Image2.png
1017 ms
Player-4-1-1.jpeg
996 ms
Server2.png
971 ms
Player-5-1.jpeg
1123 ms
Player-6-2.jpeg
1769 ms
Player-7-2.jpeg
986 ms
Player-8-2.jpeg
998 ms
4W7VsLmb7D
525 ms
advert.gif
663 ms
sync_cookie_image_decide
145 ms
bundle_ru_RU.js
358 ms
1
143 ms
facecast.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA IDs are not unique
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
facecast.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
facecast.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Facecast.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Facecast.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
facecast.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Facecast. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: