Tools & Wizards About Us
fasph.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 48

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    66% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

fasph.com

FAS Development Corporation | Plastic Packaging Manufacturer

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

127 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

373 ms

fasph.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing FAS Ph content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fasph.com

Need food packaging? One-stop solution for food containers, stand up pouches, plastic trays, cups & egg trays, and stretch films. Click to learn more!

Visit fasph.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Fasph.com page load time and found that the first response time was 127 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fasph.com performance score

48

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

66/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

87/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.9 s

48/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,060 ms

25/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.396

25/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.0 s

34/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fasph.com

127 ms

fasph.com

260 ms

jquery.min.js

59 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

112 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

163 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (73 requests) were addressed to the original Fasph.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (476 ms) belongs to the original domain Fasph.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 196.0 kB (35%)

Content Size

553.1 kB

After Optimization

357.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Fasph.com main page is 553.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 311.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 192.9 kB

  • Original 242.0 kB
  • After minification 239.1 kB
  • After compression 49.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 192.9 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.1 kB

  • Original 311.1 kB
  • After minification 308.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. FAS Ph images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (64%)

Requests Now

72

After Optimization

26

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of FAS Ph. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 47 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

fasph.com

fasph.com

127 ms

fasph.com

fasph.com

260 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

59 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

112 ms

frontend-gtag.min.js

frontend-gtag.min.js

163 ms

jquery.blockUI.min.js

jquery.blockUI.min.js

164 ms

add-to-cart.min.js

add-to-cart.min.js

162 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

161 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

163 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

169 ms

datepicker.min.js

datepicker.min.js

214 ms

front-custom.js

front-custom.js

213 ms

woocommerce-add-to-cart.js

woocommerce-add-to-cart.js

211 ms

button-label-frontend.min.js

button-label-frontend.min.js

211 ms

above-the-fold.min.js

above-the-fold.min.js

211 ms

woocommerce.min.js

woocommerce.min.js

214 ms

ultimate-params.min.js

ultimate-params.min.js

268 ms

custom.min.js

custom.min.js

270 ms

headings.min.js

headings.min.js

269 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

270 ms

jquery-appear.min.js

jquery-appear.min.js

268 ms

slick-custom.min.js

slick-custom.min.js

270 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

372 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

319 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

380 ms

quform.js

quform.js

317 ms

underscore-before.js

underscore-before.js

313 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

314 ms

underscore-after.js

underscore-after.js

365 ms

wp-util.min.js

wp-util.min.js

367 ms

api-request.min.js

api-request.min.js

369 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

371 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

418 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

476 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

421 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

422 ms

url.min.js

url.min.js

423 ms

css

css

26 ms

api-fetch.min.js

api-fetch.min.js

428 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

413 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff

15 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff

20 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff

29 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

346 ms

script.js

script.js

324 ms

legacy.min.js

legacy.min.js

325 ms

jquery-mousewheel.min.js

jquery-mousewheel.min.js

387 ms

custom-scrollbar.min.js

custom-scrollbar.min.js

425 ms

esg.min.js

esg.min.js

384 ms

ultimate_bg.min.js

ultimate_bg.min.js

377 ms

cp-module-main.js

cp-module-main.js

339 ms

modal.min.js

modal.min.js

337 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

339 ms

dummy.png

dummy.png

438 ms

300x200transparent.png

300x200transparent.png

438 ms

icomoon-the7-font.ttf

icomoon-the7-font.ttf

379 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff

3 ms

font

font

7 ms

fas-64.png

fas-64.png

97 ms

about-image.png

about-image.png

109 ms

cofta-140.png

cofta-140.png

135 ms

cpack-140.png

cpack-140.png

97 ms

dabba.jpg

dabba.jpg

97 ms

fancywrap.jpg

fancywrap.jpg

98 ms

faspack.jpg

faspack.jpg

109 ms

fasprint.jpg

fasprint.jpg

142 ms

freds.jpg

freds.jpg

142 ms

sacco.jpg

sacco.jpg

146 ms

profilm.jpg

profilm.jpg

157 ms

junni.jpg

junni.jpg

158 ms

loadmaster.jpg

loadmaster.jpg

187 ms

power-pallet.jpg

power-pallet.jpg

194 ms

nexor.jpg

nexor.jpg

194 ms

rackmaster.jpg

rackmaster.jpg

199 ms

synroof.jpg

synroof.jpg

210 ms

xanlite.jpg

xanlite.jpg

210 ms

versaboard.jpg

versaboard.jpg

240 ms

faslogo-64.png

faslogo-64.png

247 ms

cross.png

cross.png

247 ms

Accessibility Review

fasph.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

fasph.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

fasph.com SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fasph.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fasph.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

fasph.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of FAS Ph. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: