Tools & Wizards About Us
fcclitchfield.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 85

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    88% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

fcclitchfield.com

First Congregational Church Of Litchfield - Gathered in 1721

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

111 ms

Resources Loaded

674 ms

Page Rendered

254 ms

fcclitchfield.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Fcc Litchfield content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fcclitchfield.com

Where the spirit of the lord is, there is liberty. Welcome to The FCC, home of the historic New England meeting house on the green.

Visit fcclitchfield.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Fcclitchfield.com page load time and found that the first response time was 111 ms and then it took 928 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fcclitchfield.com performance score

85

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

68/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value130 ms

96/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.081

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.5 s

92/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fcclitchfield.com

111 ms

4b6c84a60fa5989846bc5e97e39dc2f2.css

83 ms

et-core-unified-tb-230140-tb-37647-19-17069003746479.min.css

60 ms

et-core-unified-19-17069003746479.min.css

58 ms

email-decode.min.js

27 ms

Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 54% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Fcclitchfield.com, 43% (20 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (255 ms) belongs to the original domain Fcclitchfield.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 60.9 kB (1%)

Content Size

6.3 MB

After Optimization

6.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Fcclitchfield.com main page is 6.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 6.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 56.5 kB

  • Original 72.9 kB
  • After minification 72.8 kB
  • After compression 16.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.5 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 4.3 kB

  • Original 6.2 MB
  • After minification 6.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fcc Litchfield images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 17 B

  • Original 655 B
  • After minification 655 B
  • After compression 638 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (54%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fcc Litchfield. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

fcclitchfield.com

fcclitchfield.com

111 ms

4b6c84a60fa5989846bc5e97e39dc2f2.css

4b6c84a60fa5989846bc5e97e39dc2f2.css

83 ms

et-core-unified-tb-230140-tb-37647-19-17069003746479.min.css

et-core-unified-tb-230140-tb-37647-19-17069003746479.min.css

60 ms

et-core-unified-19-17069003746479.min.css

et-core-unified-19-17069003746479.min.css

58 ms

email-decode.min.js

email-decode.min.js

27 ms

picturefill.min.js

picturefill.min.js

190 ms

custom.unified.js

custom.unified.js

192 ms

common.js

common.js

188 ms

gsap.min.js

gsap.min.js

195 ms

splitting.js

splitting.js

192 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

194 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

189 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

189 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

192 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

192 ms

css

css

40 ms

86802869_106722957586587_3757568476684746752_o.jpg

86802869_106722957586587_3757568476684746752_o.jpg

130 ms

church-road.jpg

church-road.jpg

132 ms

bookstorepath.jpg

bookstorepath.jpg

133 ms

beecherheadphones.jpg

beecherheadphones.jpg

130 ms

logo-without-building-stamp.png

logo-without-building-stamp.png

120 ms

DJI_0179.jpg

DJI_0179.jpg

255 ms

church-button.jpg

church-button.jpg

121 ms

FCC-Library-7.jpg

FCC-Library-7.jpg

240 ms

giving.jpg

giving.jpg

215 ms

PlI5Fl60Nb5obNzNe2jslWxNvcQ.ttf

PlI5Fl60Nb5obNzNe2jslWxNvcQ.ttf

38 ms

modules.ttf

modules.ttf

115 ms

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDLshdTo3ig.ttf

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDLshdTo3ig.ttf

37 ms

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDOUhdTo3ig.ttf

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDOUhdTo3ig.ttf

45 ms

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDDshdTo3ig.ttf

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDDshdTo3ig.ttf

46 ms

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDGUmdTo3ig.ttf

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDGUmdTo3ig.ttf

48 ms

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDFwmdTo3ig.ttf

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDFwmdTo3ig.ttf

49 ms

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDDsmdTo3ig.ttf

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDDsmdTo3ig.ttf

47 ms

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDBImdTo3ig.ttf

XRXI3I6Li01BKofiOc5wtlZ2di8HDBImdTo3ig.ttf

50 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDZbtY.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDZbtY.ttf

50 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKd3vXDZbtY.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKd3vXDZbtY.ttf

51 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKebunDZbtY.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKebunDZbtY.ttf

52 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKeiunDZbtY.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKeiunDZbtY.ttf

88 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKfFunDZbtY.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKfFunDZbtY.ttf

87 ms

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKfsunDZbtY.ttf

nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKfsunDZbtY.ttf

87 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf

86 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf

86 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf

88 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxGIzc.ttf

90 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf

88 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfChc9.ttf

89 ms

Accessibility Review

fcclitchfield.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

fcclitchfield.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

fcclitchfield.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fcclitchfield.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fcclitchfield.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

fcclitchfield.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fcc Litchfield. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: