Tools & Wizards About Us
festnetz-vergleich.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

festnetz-vergleich.de

DSL Vergleich & Kabel Internet Anbieter - Alle Angebote

Page Load Speed

4.6 sec in total

First Response

335 ms

Resources Loaded

3.9 sec

Page Rendered

317 ms

festnetz-vergleich.de screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Festnetz Vergleich content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about festnetz-vergleich.de

Kabel Internet Anbieter ✓ DSL Vergleich ✓ die günstigsten Angebote im Preisvergleich ✓ jetzt informieren und beantragen

Visit festnetz-vergleich.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Festnetz-vergleich.de page load time and found that the first response time was 335 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

festnetz-vergleich.de performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

42/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.0 s

14/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value170 ms

92/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.187

65/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.7 s

36/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

festnetz-vergleich.de

335 ms

www.festnetz-vergleich.de

1067 ms

style.min.css

163 ms

pagenavi-css.css

283 ms

style.css

315 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Festnetz-vergleich.de, 6% (3 requests) were made to Dwin2.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Files.check24.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Festnetz-vergleich.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 50.2 kB (24%)

Content Size

205.3 kB

After Optimization

155.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Festnetz-vergleich.de main page is 205.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 88.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 35.9 kB

  • Original 45.2 kB
  • After minification 45.2 kB
  • After compression 9.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.9 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 88.5 kB
  • After minification 86.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Festnetz Vergleich images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 917 B

  • Original 27.3 kB
  • After minification 27.3 kB
  • After compression 26.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 11.5 kB

  • Original 44.3 kB
  • After minification 44.3 kB
  • After compression 32.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Festnetz-vergleich.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.5 kB or 26% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (23%)

Requests Now

47

After Optimization

36

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Festnetz Vergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

festnetz-vergleich.de

festnetz-vergleich.de

335 ms

www.festnetz-vergleich.de

www.festnetz-vergleich.de

1067 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

163 ms

pagenavi-css.css

pagenavi-css.css

283 ms

style.css

style.css

315 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

318 ms

style.css

style.css

326 ms

borlabs-cookie-1-de.css

borlabs-cookie-1-de.css

430 ms

borlabs-cookie-config-de.json.js

borlabs-cookie-config-de.json.js

338 ms

borlabs-cookie-tcf-stub.min.js

borlabs-cookie-tcf-stub.min.js

399 ms

dsl-iframe.js

dsl-iframe.js

393 ms

borlabs-cookie-iabtcf.min.js

borlabs-cookie-iabtcf.min.js

421 ms

pub.399233.min.js

pub.399233.min.js

341 ms

pub.399233.min.js

pub.399233.min.js

347 ms

header_2016.jpg

header_2016.jpg

185 ms

logo_header_small.png

logo_header_small.png

113 ms

telekom.png

telekom.png

119 ms

1und1.gif

1und1.gif

121 ms

m-net.gif

m-net.gif

127 ms

o2.png

o2.png

122 ms

unitymedia.gif

unitymedia.gif

229 ms

vodafone.png

vodafone.png

240 ms

pyur.png

pyur.png

247 ms

ewe.gif

ewe.gif

242 ms

netcologne.png

netcologne.png

244 ms

kabel-deutschland.gif

kabel-deutschland.gif

306 ms

telekom_sb.png

telekom_sb.png

349 ms

1und1_sb.png

1und1_sb.png

362 ms

o2_sb.png

o2_sb.png

357 ms

vodafone_sb.png

vodafone_sb.png

363 ms

ewe_sb.png

ewe_sb.png

391 ms

pyur_sb.png

pyur_sb.png

436 ms

unitymedia_sb.png

unitymedia_sb.png

468 ms

m-net_sb.png

m-net_sb.png

482 ms

netcologne_sb.png

netcologne_sb.png

487 ms

kabel-bw_sb.png

kabel-bw_sb.png

492 ms

kabel-deutschland_sb.png

kabel-deutschland_sb.png

572 ms

telecolumbus_sb.png

telecolumbus_sb.png

576 ms

primacom_sb.png

primacom_sb.png

654 ms

vodafone.png

vodafone.png

597 ms

telekom.png

telekom.png

656 ms

1und1.gif

1und1.gif

605 ms

o2.png

o2.png

684 ms

pyur.png

pyur.png

709 ms

m-net.gif

m-net.gif

717 ms

netcologne.png

netcologne.png

723 ms

ewe.gif

ewe.gif

772 ms

festnetz.png

festnetz.png

777 ms

open-sans-v15-latin-700.woff

open-sans-v15-latin-700.woff

800 ms

open-sans-v15-latin-800.woff

open-sans-v15-latin-800.woff

839 ms

init.js

init.js

2 ms

open-sans-v15-latin-600.woff

open-sans-v15-latin-600.woff

781 ms

open-sans-v15-latin-regular.woff

open-sans-v15-latin-regular.woff

785 ms

open-sans-v15-latin-300.woff

open-sans-v15-latin-300.woff

838 ms

Accessibility Review

festnetz-vergleich.de accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

festnetz-vergleich.de best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

festnetz-vergleich.de SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Festnetz-vergleich.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Festnetz-vergleich.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

festnetz-vergleich.de

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Festnetz Vergleich. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: