Tools & Wizards About Us
fluidpolishing.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 9

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    23% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

fluidpolishing.com

Fuel Polishing | Fuel Polishing Services | Fluid Polishing Inc

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

404 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

470 ms

fluidpolishing.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to fluidpolishing.com homepage info - get ready to check Fluid Polishing best content right away, or after learning these important things about fluidpolishing.com

We are the leaders in Fuel Polishing services. Contact us today to have your Diesel Fuel Tank Cleaned and Serviced with Fluid Polishing Inc

Visit fluidpolishing.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Fluidpolishing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 404 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fluidpolishing.com performance score

9

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value22.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.5 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,070 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.307

38/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.8 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fluidpolishing.com

404 ms

assets.min.css

186 ms

css

24 ms

styles.css

207 ms

main.css

153 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 21% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Fluidpolishing.com, 26% (20 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 14% (11 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (513 ms) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 317.9 kB (42%)

Content Size

754.4 kB

After Optimization

436.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Fluidpolishing.com main page is 754.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 409.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 94.5 kB

  • Original 109.1 kB
  • After minification 104.8 kB
  • After compression 14.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 94.5 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 175.2 kB
  • After minification 175.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fluid Polishing images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 223.3 kB

  • Original 409.5 kB
  • After minification 409.5 kB
  • After compression 186.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 223.3 kB or 55% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 60.7 kB
  • After minification 60.7 kB
  • After compression 60.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fluidpolishing.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (64%)

Requests Now

67

After Optimization

24

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fluid Polishing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 39 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

fluidpolishing.com

fluidpolishing.com

404 ms

assets.min.css

assets.min.css

186 ms

css

css

24 ms

styles.css

styles.css

207 ms

main.css

main.css

153 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

5 ms

website.assets.min.js

website.assets.min.js

291 ms

website.min.js

website.min.js

165 ms

moto.store.site.min.js

moto.store.site.min.js

242 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

30 ms

watch.js

watch.js

29 ms

mt-0085-home-img-bg-1.jpg

mt-0085-home-img-bg-1.jpg

105 ms

mt-0085-home-img-bg-header.jpg

mt-0085-home-img-bg-header.jpg

105 ms

mt-0085-home-img-bg-2.jpg

mt-0085-home-img-bg-2.jpg

172 ms

mt-0085-home-img-bg-3.jpg

mt-0085-home-img-bg-3.jpg

170 ms

collect

collect

181 ms

6dtb1IajONk

6dtb1IajONk

218 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvTtw.ttf

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCxCvTtw.ttf

86 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3Ttw.ttf

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoCjC3Ttw.ttf

102 ms

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgo6eA.ttf

4iCs6KVjbNBYlgo6eA.ttf

136 ms

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzTtw.ttf

4iCv6KVjbNBYlgoC1CzTtw.ttf

513 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

176 ms

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

99 ms

fluid-polishing-logo-png-transparent-medium.png

fluid-polishing-logo-png-transparent-medium.png

94 ms

tsc-7000-170.png

tsc-7000-170.png

105 ms

mt-0085-home-block-img2.jpg

mt-0085-home-block-img2.jpg

104 ms

lab-165.jpg

lab-165.jpg

93 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

33 ms

settings

settings

384 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

9 ms

js

js

229 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

20 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

39 ms

base.js

base.js

63 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

154 ms

Uo_dhVY9o5gWds10f-QE3r7w2DYPAY7ZjhqsbDUx1y0.js

Uo_dhVY9o5gWds10f-QE3r7w2DYPAY7ZjhqsbDUx1y0.js

140 ms

embed.js

embed.js

59 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

59 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

61 ms

timeline.e108540dddc96e4b707f5cf259a582d7.js

timeline.e108540dddc96e4b707f5cf259a582d7.js

38 ms

button.856debeac157d9669cf51e73a08fbc93.js

button.856debeac157d9669cf51e73a08fbc93.js

42 ms

id

id

21 ms

Create

Create

97 ms

embeds

embeds

92 ms

FluidPolishing

FluidPolishing

196 ms

tweet_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.en.html

tweet_button.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.en.html

88 ms

polyfills-a40ef1678bae11e696dba45124eadd70.js

polyfills-a40ef1678bae11e696dba45124eadd70.js

7 ms

runtime-b1c52fd0a13ead5fcf6b.js

runtime-b1c52fd0a13ead5fcf6b.js

6 ms

modules-96ebc7ac3ad66d681a3d.js

modules-96ebc7ac3ad66d681a3d.js

29 ms

main-babd9234dc048fb47339.js

main-babd9234dc048fb47339.js

24 ms

_app-a9c9f1a99e4414675fb1.js

_app-a9c9f1a99e4414675fb1.js

22 ms

%5BscreenName%5D-0517bdda27d5006a5a2d.js

%5BscreenName%5D-0517bdda27d5006a5a2d.js

28 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

28 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

57 ms

page.php

page.php

239 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

51 ms

8526.0c32a8f0cfc5749221a3.js

8526.0c32a8f0cfc5749221a3.js

11 ms

1755.07a49c40b12af4f75780.js

1755.07a49c40b12af4f75780.js

11 ms

8283.f3e5048cca7cef5eed7f.js

8283.f3e5048cca7cef5eed7f.js

9 ms

3077.44bfeb00af01bc4020f6.js

3077.44bfeb00af01bc4020f6.js

20 ms

1362.42d432e02f7980bca032.js

1362.42d432e02f7980bca032.js

9 ms

4956.c4e51ef593974b9db0bb.js

4956.c4e51ef593974b9db0bb.js

20 ms

5893.d500bd2a89ded806aa73.js

5893.d500bd2a89ded806aa73.js

8 ms

F58doZFb9jE.css

F58doZFb9jE.css

37 ms

7TXvrmQm8c5.js

7TXvrmQm8c5.js

44 ms

Vvet8_5H-wT.js

Vvet8_5H-wT.js

68 ms

zYyn94Uppv5.js

zYyn94Uppv5.js

70 ms

tC2E_WEPqHv.js

tC2E_WEPqHv.js

70 ms

c64elx0V1Fa.js

c64elx0V1Fa.js

68 ms

p55HfXW__mM.js

p55HfXW__mM.js

70 ms

KroQaZupEyF.js

KroQaZupEyF.js

69 ms

x0GZ5cfQS7u.js

x0GZ5cfQS7u.js

69 ms

294255263_476088681185154_899033748979452418_n.jpg

294255263_476088681185154_899033748979452418_n.jpg

402 ms

294521959_476088677851821_4041482733374395994_n.jpg

294521959_476088677851821_4041482733374395994_n.jpg

70 ms

wjv1Jo1HAky.js

wjv1Jo1HAky.js

9 ms

UXtr_j2Fwe-.png

UXtr_j2Fwe-.png

6 ms

Accessibility Review

fluidpolishing.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

fluidpolishing.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

fluidpolishing.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fluidpolishing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fluidpolishing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

fluidpolishing.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fluid Polishing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: