Tools & Wizards About Us
foodwatch.de screenshot

Report Summary

  • 62

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

foodwatch.de

foodwatch - die Essensretter | FW DE

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

264 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

241 ms

foodwatch.de screenshot

About Website

Visit foodwatch.de now to see the best up-to-date Foodwatch content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about foodwatch.de

foodwatch entlarvt die verbraucherfeindlichen Praktiken der Lebensmittelindustrie und kämpft für das Recht auf gute, gesunde und ehrliche Lebensmittel.

Visit foodwatch.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Foodwatch.de page load time and found that the first response time was 264 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

foodwatch.de performance score

62

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

60/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

70/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.1 s

31/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value320 ms

76/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.298

40/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.7 s

68/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

foodwatch.de

264 ms

foodwatch.de

377 ms

507 ms

merged-478d1e30d31297c0f6dee7e9f730a7f4-1d1d6e5c56cdad5b51003a3be5b5bb8d.css

194 ms

merged-4316ae9f8ef8f8acfdbb20001a25852f-4a7f12282c7661c584b839fd2161eaab.js

279 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Foodwatch.de, 92% (24 requests) were made to Foodwatch.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (671 ms) relates to the external source Foodwatch.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 114.7 kB (14%)

Content Size

831.2 kB

After Optimization

716.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Foodwatch.de main page is 831.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 718.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 95.8 kB

  • Original 112.7 kB
  • After minification 82.4 kB
  • After compression 16.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 30.2 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 95.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 19.0 kB

  • Original 718.5 kB
  • After minification 699.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Foodwatch images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (40%)

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Foodwatch. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

foodwatch.de

foodwatch.de

264 ms

foodwatch.de

foodwatch.de

377 ms

507 ms

merged-478d1e30d31297c0f6dee7e9f730a7f4-1d1d6e5c56cdad5b51003a3be5b5bb8d.css

merged-478d1e30d31297c0f6dee7e9f730a7f4-1d1d6e5c56cdad5b51003a3be5b5bb8d.css

194 ms

merged-4316ae9f8ef8f8acfdbb20001a25852f-4a7f12282c7661c584b839fd2161eaab.js

merged-4316ae9f8ef8f8acfdbb20001a25852f-4a7f12282c7661c584b839fd2161eaab.js

279 ms

main.concat-6cc1cd5ebc6386cac7009b0c3e8b7cff.js

main.concat-6cc1cd5ebc6386cac7009b0c3e8b7cff.js

671 ms

js.cookie.min-c14c86577aab6e9502c27a3427d4e158.js

js.cookie.min-c14c86577aab6e9502c27a3427d4e158.js

278 ms

cookieman-f8470c8d020eae775b51cc095a48b484.js

cookieman-f8470c8d020eae775b51cc095a48b484.js

358 ms

cookieman-theme-e6868d8de28340a66e30f26468e1496c.js

cookieman-theme-e6868d8de28340a66e30f26468e1496c.js

277 ms

cookieman-init-d0099f16100fae3cfabcfedad8af669b.js

cookieman-init-d0099f16100fae3cfabcfedad8af669b.js

357 ms

merged-dcd3dd51981a3da4411aa8b76d53e9b1-0a35ff65968bd843326f8cc0f845933c.js

merged-dcd3dd51981a3da4411aa8b76d53e9b1-0a35ff65968bd843326f8cc0f845933c.js

368 ms

svg-sprite-646af2c1.svg

svg-sprite-646af2c1.svg

98 ms

csm_2310x1291px_c7c21ac948.jpg

csm_2310x1291px_c7c21ac948.jpg

480 ms

csm_Traktor_shutterstock.com_stockr_231150910_7b61c7faa3.jpg

csm_Traktor_shutterstock.com_stockr_231150910_7b61c7faa3.jpg

187 ms

csm_Design_ohne_Titel__13__80e7bbec70.png

csm_Design_ohne_Titel__13__80e7bbec70.png

642 ms

csm_Ferkel___Schwein_Tierhaltung_Fotolia_krumanop_166953694_770x433px_nachricht_a3f553c040.jpg

csm_Ferkel___Schwein_Tierhaltung_Fotolia_krumanop_166953694_770x433px_nachricht_a3f553c040.jpg

252 ms

csm_Anbindehaltung_Kuehe_Exquisa-Weihenstephan-Naturland-Andechser-MinusL_foodwatch_1460x820x_2827f2a480.jpg

csm_Anbindehaltung_Kuehe_Exquisa-Weihenstephan-Naturland-Andechser-MinusL_foodwatch_1460x820x_2827f2a480.jpg

283 ms

csm_Foodwatch_Website_a451163029.jpg

csm_Foodwatch_Website_a451163029.jpg

480 ms

neuton-v10-latin-regular.woff

neuton-v10-latin-regular.woff

291 ms

neuton-v10-latin-300.woff

neuton-v10-latin-300.woff

364 ms

neuton-v10-latin-700.woff

neuton-v10-latin-700.woff

388 ms

oswald-v16-latin-500.woff

oswald-v16-latin-500.woff

401 ms

oswald-v16-latin-regular.woff

oswald-v16-latin-regular.woff

425 ms

oswald-v16-latin-300.woff

oswald-v16-latin-300.woff

476 ms

oswald-v16-latin-600.woff

oswald-v16-latin-600.woff

496 ms

oswald-v16-latin-700.woff

oswald-v16-latin-700.woff

504 ms

Accessibility Review

foodwatch.de accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

foodwatch.de best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

foodwatch.de SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Foodwatch.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Foodwatch.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

foodwatch.de

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Foodwatch. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: