Tools & Wizards About Us
forenet.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

forenet.net

A Full-Service Barrier Netting & Pole Installation Company | Forenet

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

311 ms

Resources Loaded

3.2 sec

Page Rendered

766 ms

forenet.net screenshot

About Website

Visit forenet.net now to see the best up-to-date Forenet content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about forenet.net

Forenet is a family owned business specializing in the installation, design and repair of golf range and barrier netting systems for the past four decades.

Visit forenet.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Forenet.net page load time and found that the first response time was 311 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

forenet.net performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

48/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

79/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value460 ms

61/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.6 s

29/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

forenet.net

311 ms

www.forenet.net

301 ms

css2

34 ms

bootstrap.min.css

366 ms

fontawesome-all.min.css

405 ms

Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Forenet.net, 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Forenet.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 416.4 kB (18%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Forenet.net main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 14.2 kB

  • Original 17.7 kB
  • After minification 12.8 kB
  • After compression 3.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.9 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.2 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 12.6 kB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Forenet images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 156.9 kB

  • Original 225.6 kB
  • After minification 225.6 kB
  • After compression 68.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 156.9 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 232.7 kB

  • Original 278.0 kB
  • After minification 271.9 kB
  • After compression 45.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Forenet.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 232.7 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (46%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

13

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Forenet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

forenet.net

forenet.net

311 ms

www.forenet.net

www.forenet.net

301 ms

css2

css2

34 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

366 ms

fontawesome-all.min.css

fontawesome-all.min.css

405 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

241 ms

aos.css

aos.css

326 ms

style.css

style.css

324 ms

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

jquery-3.6.0.min.js

409 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

409 ms

magnific-popup.js

magnific-popup.js

408 ms

isotope.js

isotope.js

424 ms

aos.js

aos.js

408 ms

site.js

site.js

428 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

92 ms

forenet-full.png

forenet-full.png

82 ms

forenet-half.png

forenet-half.png

136 ms

netting1.gif

netting1.gif

2185 ms

DSC_0019.JPG

DSC_0019.JPG

1409 ms

Highfield-Golf-2.gif

Highfield-Golf-2.gif

886 ms

Innis-Before-After-2.gif

Innis-Before-After-2.gif

590 ms

DSC_0275.JPG

DSC_0275.JPG

394 ms

Steel-poles-4.jpg

Steel-poles-4.jpg

217 ms

LeLacheur-Park-2.jpg

LeLacheur-Park-2.jpg

366 ms

Landfill-1.JPG

Landfill-1.JPG

445 ms

forenet-logo-net-half.png

forenet-logo-net-half.png

476 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

490 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

522 ms

Accessibility Review

forenet.net accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

forenet.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

forenet.net SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Forenet.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Forenet.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

forenet.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Forenet. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: