Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 95

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 86% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

futuresoft.in

Enterprise Application Services | Software Development & Solutions

Page Load Speed

6 sec in total

First Response

392 ms

Resources Loaded

4.7 sec

Page Rendered

874 ms

futuresoft.in screenshot

About Website

Visit futuresoft.in now to see the best up-to-date Futuresoft content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about futuresoft.in

Enterprise Application Services and Enterprise Managed Services at FutureSoftIndia.We offer enterprise management services and enterprise managed services. Visit for enterprise application services.

Visit futuresoft.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Futuresoft.in page load time and found that the first response time was 392 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

futuresoft.in performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

51/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.1 s

44/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,070 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.4 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

futuresoft.in

392 ms

futuresoftindia.com

1360 ms

optimize.js

61 ms

styles.pure.css

792 ms

jquery.min.js

432 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Futuresoft.in, 87% (54 requests) were made to Futuresoftindia.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Bat.bing.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) relates to the external source Futuresoftindia.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 302.8 kB (38%)

Content Size

789.0 kB

After Optimization

486.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Futuresoft.in main page is 789.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 366.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 224.1 kB

  • Original 302.5 kB
  • After minification 255.1 kB
  • After compression 78.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 47.4 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 224.1 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 61.6 kB

  • Original 366.2 kB
  • After minification 304.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Futuresoft needs image optimization as it can save up to 61.6 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 17.1 kB

  • Original 86.9 kB
  • After minification 86.9 kB
  • After compression 69.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 17.1 kB or 20% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 33.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (16%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

48

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Futuresoft. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

futuresoft.in accessibility score

95

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

futuresoft.in best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

futuresoft.in SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Futuresoft.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Futuresoft.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Futuresoft. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: