3.3 sec in total
330 ms
2.5 sec
486 ms
Visit gcc-usa.com now to see the best up-to-date Gcc Usa content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gcc-usa.com
General Commercial Corporation | Sebring,OH. Best selection of promotional items, apparel and corporate gifts. Let us earn your business with our 1st class service and low prices.
Visit gcc-usa.comWe analyzed Gcc-usa.com page load time and found that the first response time was 330 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
gcc-usa.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value14.6 s
0/100
10%
Value28.5 s
0/100
25%
Value14.6 s
1/100
10%
Value910 ms
31/100
30%
Value0.066
97/100
15%
Value21.1 s
1/100
10%
330 ms
102 ms
37 ms
167 ms
492 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Gcc-usa.com, 5% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Gcc-usa.com.
Page size can be reduced by 203.3 kB (6%)
3.4 MB
3.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Gcc-usa.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 56.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.5 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 89.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gcc Usa images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 35.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 21.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gcc-usa.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (44%)
81
45
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gcc Usa. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.gcc-usa.com
330 ms
bootstrap.min.css
102 ms
css
37 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
167 ms
flexslider.css
492 ms
all.min.css
504 ms
slick.css
495 ms
lightbox.css
498 ms
yamm.css
492 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
495 ms
StyleSheet
548 ms
Pic
499 ms
37JVQ_iezAc
108 ms
Utils.js
494 ms
jquery.min.js
522 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
523 ms
migrate-3.1.0.js
494 ms
bootstrap.min.js
550 ms
slick.min.js
524 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
525 ms
superfish.min.js
524 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
540 ms
lightbox.js
548 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
549 ms
iframeResizer.min.js
540 ms
IFrameUtils.js
605 ms
jquery.backstretch.min.js
670 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
669 ms
scripts.js
668 ms
datepicker-fr-ca.js
603 ms
custom.js
603 ms
highslide-full.packed.js
680 ms
highslide.config.js
680 ms
highslide.css
679 ms
Pic
846 ms
Pic
853 ms
Pic
851 ms
QPic
846 ms
QPic
847 ms
QPic
631 ms
www-player.css
7 ms
www-embed-player.js
26 ms
base.js
64 ms
QPic
691 ms
ad_status.js
268 ms
-0TfInu9ra9zkah2wyCD78KX7EDwI16Gf6-9m2UuzfU.js
254 ms
embed.js
82 ms
QPic
366 ms
QPic
363 ms
QPic
364 ms
QPic
364 ms
QPic
363 ms
QPic
450 ms
QPic
450 ms
QPic
424 ms
QPic
426 ms
QPic
424 ms
QPic
424 ms
QPic
424 ms
QPic
425 ms
QPic
419 ms
QPic
410 ms
css
40 ms
QPic
401 ms
QPic
402 ms
QPic
405 ms
QPic
406 ms
QPic
404 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
133 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
179 ms
id
22 ms
Create
128 ms
WEBlogPic
465 ms
WEBlogPic
465 ms
QPic
358 ms
Pic
358 ms
close.png
348 ms
loading.gif
348 ms
S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf
58 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
573 ms
fa-light-300.ttf
606 ms
fa-thin-100.ttf
1160 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
413 ms
fa-brands-400.ttf
271 ms
prev.png
656 ms
next.png
302 ms
Pic
401 ms
GenerateIT
108 ms
custom.png
38 ms
zoomout.cur
46 ms
loader.white.gif
36 ms
flexslider-icon.woff
37 ms
gcc-usa.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
ARIA IDs are not unique
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
gcc-usa.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
gcc-usa.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gcc-usa.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gcc-usa.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gcc-usa.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gcc Usa. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: