Tools & Wizards About Us
gempl.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 28

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    47% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

gempl.net

Acid Proof Tiles Manufacturers in India | Good Earth

Page Load Speed

7.2 sec in total

First Response

29 ms

Resources Loaded

7 sec

Page Rendered

148 ms

gempl.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to gempl.net homepage info - get ready to check Gempl best content right away, or after learning these important things about gempl.net

We are the leading acid proof tile manufacturers in Mumbai. We offer acid proof tiles and linings to all major sectors | Good Earth

Visit gempl.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Gempl.net page load time and found that the first response time was 29 ms and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gempl.net performance score

28

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value21.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value790 ms

37/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.3 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gempl.net

29 ms

www.gempl.net

1009 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

558 ms

style.min.css

559 ms

font-awesome.min.css

575 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Gempl.net, 21% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Gempl.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 35.1 kB (1%)

Content Size

2.8 MB

After Optimization

2.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gempl.net main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 18.5 kB

  • Original 24.1 kB
  • After minification 22.8 kB
  • After compression 5.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.5 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 9.0 kB

  • Original 2.5 MB
  • After minification 2.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gempl images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 115.9 kB
  • After minification 115.9 kB
  • After compression 113.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 5.1 kB

  • Original 119.8 kB
  • After minification 119.8 kB
  • After compression 114.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gempl.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (79%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gempl. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gempl.net

gempl.net

29 ms

www.gempl.net

www.gempl.net

1009 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

558 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

559 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

575 ms

styles.css

styles.css

564 ms

style.css

style.css

578 ms

animsition.min.css

animsition.min.css

561 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

1362 ms

magnific-popup.css

magnific-popup.css

1110 ms

animate.css

animate.css

1086 ms

pe-icon-7-stroke.css

pe-icon-7-stroke.css

1105 ms

main.css

main.css

1424 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

1114 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

2207 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

1936 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1662 ms

modernizr-2.6.2.min.js

modernizr-2.6.2.min.js

1672 ms

js

js

74 ms

js

js

117 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

1904 ms

wpcf7-redirect-script.js

wpcf7-redirect-script.js

1982 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

2706 ms

main.js

main.js

2203 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

2444 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

2463 ms

css

css

22 ms

css

css

37 ms

css

css

40 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

88 ms

GE-Minerals-logo-1-e1506680063288.png

GE-Minerals-logo-1-e1506680063288.png

541 ms

brackets.png

brackets.png

525 ms

search-icon.png

search-icon.png

547 ms

thumbnail.jpg

thumbnail.jpg

701 ms

slide-line.png

slide-line.png

679 ms

slide-btn.png

slide-btn.png

952 ms

shutterstock_opt.jpg

shutterstock_opt.jpg

1074 ms

shutterstock_156554171.jpg

shutterstock_156554171.jpg

1053 ms

shutterstock_winecellar.jpg

shutterstock_winecellar.jpg

1068 ms

soc-bg.png

soc-bg.png

1232 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf

25 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

28 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf

27 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf

29 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf

27 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrQ.ttf

27 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrQ.ttf

28 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf

56 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf

56 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQ.ttf

56 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf

54 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

1648 ms

slide-point.png

slide-point.png

981 ms

Accessibility Review

gempl.net accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

gempl.net best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

gempl.net SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gempl.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Gempl.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gempl.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gempl. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: