6.6 sec in total
641 ms
5.5 sec
467 ms
Click here to check amazing Gesgep content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gesgep.com
gesgep | Simple and Practical
Visit gesgep.comWe analyzed Gesgep.com page load time and found that the first response time was 641 ms and then it took 5.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
gesgep.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
15/100
10%
Value24.9 s
0/100
25%
Value15.3 s
1/100
10%
Value1,400 ms
16/100
30%
Value1.045
2/100
15%
Value34.2 s
0/100
10%
641 ms
1452 ms
213 ms
39 ms
56 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Gesgep.com, 13% (7 requests) were made to Img.echosting.cafe24.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to Ecimg.cafe24img.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.9 sec) relates to the external source Ecimg.cafe24img.com.
Page size can be reduced by 749.4 kB (23%)
3.2 MB
2.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Gesgep.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 117.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 117.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 610.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Gesgep needs image optimization as it can save up to 610.8 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 9.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 11.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gesgep.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 11.3 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (27%)
49
36
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gesgep. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gesgep.com
641 ms
gesgep.com
1452 ms
jet.js
213 ms
css2
39 ms
css2
56 ms
xeicon.min.css
25 ms
jquery.min.js
28 ms
cid.generate.js
387 ms
wcslog.js
40 ms
froala_style_ec.min.css
230 ms
optimizer.php
385 ms
optimizer_user.php
402 ms
kakao.min.js
195 ms
i18n.php
1453 ms
optimizer.php
2137 ms
optimizer_user.php
980 ms
btn_details.gif
54 ms
talk_icon.png
974 ms
5830ea9731340c9cd178efbf960baadc.png
582 ms
78a12dc4850626c45c1d94938d96bf16.png
1044 ms
7bd9cc1cd167c5614d5fc25368b36582.png
607 ms
740f465e06880aff675a62ff13e9271d.png
961 ms
6a06f0d5d8ad93e8908aa4296a24b813.png
971 ms
c440e85705edc38e40780f0f3311089f.png
996 ms
49b6b6f9e57c438d608147db96114e33.png
1155 ms
b6ce80899ea3293fc589b5723076cef1.png
1166 ms
fc0a7c3bf1e8be72041e1a57a3431a09.png
1386 ms
598a99f6615cdefdb3887e6bc12a82cb.png
1236 ms
ea9beef7876fb6e447333245337db7c4.png
1447 ms
68944bf1c508dd23c1fb06f256c5d45e.png
1543 ms
5ccd9b6022a385c232fbb55420ed2686.png
1362 ms
774fff35e08368eaa9b5273a4aa12380.png
1428 ms
203f588620a027af15e248c225201a74.png
1559 ms
79fb5343d66b23978c8e1768ea60dedb.png
1583 ms
78eb1c016b511d059b684df71149d667.png
1620 ms
f0baf5cfa2657283b1e6ea24d03e01a6.png
1650 ms
332614c3f7a9bf9a0cdee39c3c5f059f.png
1930 ms
fb27fb7c6db73932d82711a6747b6cc2.png
1754 ms
b47d5d2be14cfe60b3ff32c40d2a4ae1.png
1971 ms
0f15483f38a1a7cdf95d99eabc4dfcc5.png
1810 ms
5bf45bfa107e12a3e389faa3bb643f44.png
1853 ms
8e0fb5e5879f784b64d2f826e3803621.png
1922 ms
735dac06a462f039393790a8ba955642.png
1949 ms
ico_tip_title.gif
51 ms
btn_close_tip.gif
94 ms
ico_product_soldout.gif
94 ms
btn_list_cart.gif
95 ms
Gotham-Book.otf
1411 ms
Gotham-Medium.otf
1461 ms
YoonGothicStd-740.otf
2848 ms
YoonGothicStd-770.otf
2903 ms
xeicon.ttf
44 ms
ico_close_white.png
29 ms
image_custom_617255408056556.png
1909 ms
image_custom_417255408054895.png
1964 ms
ua-parser.min.js
34 ms
gesgep.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
ARIA progressbar elements do not have accessible names.
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
gesgep.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
gesgep.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
KO
KO
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gesgep.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Korean is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gesgep.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gesgep.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gesgep. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: