7.7 sec in total
977 ms
6.1 sec
639 ms
Visit ggrgroup.com now to see the best up-to-date GGR Group content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ggrgroup.com
At GGR Group, we pride ourselves on helping customers become better equipped with our unrivalled range of lifting products and services.
Visit ggrgroup.comWe analyzed Ggrgroup.com page load time and found that the first response time was 977 ms and then it took 6.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
ggrgroup.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value16.7 s
0/100
10%
Value31.3 s
0/100
25%
Value23.4 s
0/100
10%
Value9,160 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.124
83/100
15%
Value33.3 s
0/100
10%
977 ms
132 ms
253 ms
1071 ms
242 ms
Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Ggrgroup.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Ggrgroup.com.
Page size can be reduced by 417.3 kB (30%)
1.4 MB
978.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Ggrgroup.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 904.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.2 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 87.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. GGR Group images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 226.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 226.0 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 43.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ggrgroup.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 43.0 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (64%)
66
24
The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GGR Group. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.ggrgroup.com
977 ms
132 ms
253 ms
jquery.js
1071 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
242 ms
253 ms
style.css
251 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
250 ms
jquery.tooltip.min.js
385 ms
cufon-yui.js
983 ms
ArialLX.js
1328 ms
VerdanaLX.js
1343 ms
jq.tweet.js
985 ms
sitescripts.js
492 ms
css
115 ms
64734.js
237 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
100 ms
618 ms
ga.js
153 ms
__utm.gif
111 ms
bg-header.gif
253 ms
logo-ggrgroupsolo.gif
356 ms
hire-awards-winner.gif
356 ms
img-headersearch.gif
251 ms
bg-topnav.png
251 ms
fallback-image-group-new_alternate.jpg
1138 ms
Capture-1.jpg
2727 ms
1006-group-site.jpg
462 ms
image.php
1061 ms
soc-facebook.gif
370 ms
soc-twittah.gif
369 ms
soc-youtube.gif
501 ms
google-plus-icon.png
500 ms
wind-speed-button.jpg
812 ms
fors-gold-accreditation.jpg
1205 ms
new-catalogue-here-bigger.jpg
1069 ms
bnr-besttraining.jpg
984 ms
img-ftrmap.gif
1107 ms
See-Us-At-Bauma1.jpg
2011 ms
bul-redarrow.gif
1140 ms
collect
328 ms
widgets.js
213 ms
bul-defaultarrow.gif
1148 ms
bul-darkorangearrow.gif
1189 ms
bul-navyarrow.gif
1223 ms
bul-yellowarrow.gif
1258 ms
bul-purplearrow.gif
1268 ms
bul-greenarrow.gif
1300 ms
bul-turquoisearrow.gif
1322 ms
bul-lightbluearrow.gif
1378 ms
bul-bluearrow.gif
1385 ms
bul-darkgreenarrow.gif
1413 ms
bg-productbox.jpg
1432 ms
thumb.png
1488 ms
new-container-tow.jpg
2161 ms
bul-whitearrow.png
1536 ms
server.php
1583 ms
e668e55f-45a5-4575-8739-4c8e0587568c.js
303 ms
close.png
1314 ms
timeline.5d8406ab2e764a871ed41bd9aa0b693f.js
141 ms
syndication
191 ms
350530496872202242
203 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
22 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
59 ms
4Yt-k-aa_normal.jpeg
240 ms
jot
57 ms
ressource.php
360 ms
ressource.php
122 ms
server.php
230 ms
ggrgroup.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ggrgroup.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
ggrgroup.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ggrgroup.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ggrgroup.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ggrgroup.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of GGR Group. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: