Tools & Wizards About Us
gigafile.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

gigafile.net

ギガファイル プロバイダー速度｜2021年7月版インターネット回線プロバイダーの速度比較ランキング｜GigaFile

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

786 ms

Resources Loaded

806 ms

Page Rendered

187 ms

gigafile.net screenshot

About Website

Visit gigafile.net now to see the best up-to-date Giga File content for Japan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gigafile.net

毎月７日更新にてギガファイル便の数百万人の実際の値によるプロバイダの速度比較ランキングを公開しています。 フレッツプロバイダー選びに必見！ 他のサイトにはない実データで表すランキングをご覧の上プロバイダ選びを行ってください。

Visit gigafile.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Gigafile.net page load time and found that the first response time was 786 ms and then it took 993 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Gigafile.net rating and web reputation

Performance Metrics

gigafile.net performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

gigafile.net

786 ms

Our browser made a total of 1 request to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Gigafile.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (786 ms) belongs to the original domain Gigafile.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 37 B (18%)

Content Size

201 B

After Optimization

164 B

  • HTML

In fact, the total size of Gigafile.net main page is 201 B. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 201 B which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 37 B

  • Original 201 B
  • After minification 200 B
  • After compression 164 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37 B or 18% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

Network Requests Diagram

gigafile.net

gigafile.net

786 ms

SEO Factors

gigafile.net SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gigafile.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Gigafile.net main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

gigafile.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Giga File. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: