1.8 sec in total
127 ms
1.6 sec
77 ms
Click here to check amazing Gingerandjardine content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gingerandjardine.co.uk
Visit gingerandjardine.co.ukWe analyzed Gingerandjardine.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 127 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
gingerandjardine.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
65/100
10%
Value7.7 s
3/100
25%
Value9.1 s
14/100
10%
Value3,620 ms
1/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value22.7 s
1/100
10%
127 ms
37 ms
85 ms
500 ms
63 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Gingerandjardine.co.uk, 33% (13 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 31% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (795 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 721.5 kB (27%)
2.6 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Gingerandjardine.co.uk main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 718.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 718.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gingerandjardine images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (40%)
25
15
The browser has sent 25 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gingerandjardine. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.gingerandjardine.co.uk
127 ms
minified.js
37 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
85 ms
polyfill.min.js
500 ms
thunderbolt-commons.7c91a755.bundle.min.js
63 ms
main.8534eeb3.bundle.min.js
64 ms
lodash.min.js
62 ms
react.production.min.js
63 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
66 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
63 ms
wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js
64 ms
49a7f4_d7d89b775d3747a7964f77d7bc9440e3~mv2.jpg
292 ms
49a7f4_479d3de94c3d444aa00b1700ccf9a25b~mv2.jpg
456 ms
49a7f4_2b969c0cc0b345aebd0a2bfa007a10c9~mv2.jpg
523 ms
49a7f4_016c707bba7d40e3b27603f712a23c2c~mv2.jpg
491 ms
49a7f4_3b758e049103483d85743d8dcc4339bb~mv2.jpg
472 ms
Ladies%20Green%20and%20Claret%20Check%20Cosy%20Roll%20.jpg
459 ms
Pheasant%20Print%20Roll%20Neck%20Bamboo%20Clothing%201.jpg
477 ms
49a7f4_f3758cee742647f1a7fcb10cebb470a5~mv2.jpg
660 ms
49a7f4_b05a17488df7412cb74c566fdde64e99~mv2.jpg
795 ms
49a7f4_fa872e90f7854612aeb510b16b3cd0a0~mv2.jpg
604 ms
bundle.min.js
106 ms
142 ms
140 ms
135 ms
132 ms
126 ms
126 ms
169 ms
163 ms
161 ms
160 ms
155 ms
157 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
10 ms
bolt-performance
29 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
10 ms
right-arrow.svg
8 ms
WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff
4 ms
gingerandjardine.co.uk accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
gingerandjardine.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
gingerandjardine.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gingerandjardine.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gingerandjardine.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gingerandjardine.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gingerandjardine. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: