Tools & Wizards About Us
giperactive.ru screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

giperactive.ru

Продвижение и оптимизация сайтов Москва цена от #3100 руб.

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

434 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

329 ms

giperactive.ru screenshot

About Website

Visit giperactive.ru now to see the best up-to-date Giperactive content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about giperactive.ru

Заказать продвижение сайтов по выгодной цене от #3100 руб. Оптимизация и эффективное SEO продвижение интернет-сайта в ТОП 10. Раскрутка и комплексное продвижение веб-сайта в поисковых системах. Звонит...

Visit giperactive.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Giperactive.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 434 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

giperactive.ru performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

34/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

42/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value800 ms

37/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.02

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.4 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

giperactive.ru

434 ms

giperactive.ru

505 ms

date.css

125 ms

datepicker.1.7.css

245 ms

field.css

358 ms

Our browser made a total of 84 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Giperactive.ru, 11% (9 requests) were made to St6-21.vk.com and 7% (6 requests) were made to Vk.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (881 ms) relates to the external source Mc.yandex.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 185.4 kB (14%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Giperactive.ru main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 820.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 32.4 kB

  • Original 45.4 kB
  • After minification 45.3 kB
  • After compression 13.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.4 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 95.5 kB

  • Original 820.6 kB
  • After minification 725.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Giperactive needs image optimization as it can save up to 95.5 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 21.4 kB

  • Original 357.5 kB
  • After minification 357.5 kB
  • After compression 336.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 36.2 kB

  • Original 139.3 kB
  • After minification 139.3 kB
  • After compression 103.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Giperactive.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 36.2 kB or 26% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (58%)

Requests Now

80

After Optimization

34

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Giperactive. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

giperactive.ru

giperactive.ru

434 ms

giperactive.ru

giperactive.ru

505 ms

date.css

date.css

125 ms

datepicker.1.7.css

datepicker.1.7.css

245 ms

field.css

field.css

358 ms

views.css

views.css

360 ms

ctools.css

ctools.css

364 ms

webform.css

webform.css

365 ms

style.css

style.css

368 ms

new.css

new.css

365 ms

added.css

added.css

476 ms

bazooka_style.css

bazooka_style.css

479 ms

ceni-seo-prodvizhenie-sajtov.css

ceni-seo-prodvizhenie-sajtov.css

483 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

725 ms

jquery.once.js

jquery.once.js

486 ms

drupal.js

drupal.js

490 ms

admin_devel.js

admin_devel.js

597 ms

captcha.js

captcha.js

606 ms

webform.js

webform.js

606 ms

holder.js

holder.js

612 ms

jquery.cookie.js

jquery.cookie.js

718 ms

ceni-seo-prodvizhenie-sajtov.js

ceni-seo-prodvizhenie-sajtov.js

716 ms

jquery.main.js

jquery.main.js

747 ms

openapi.318ba3d5a50b8d6990cb0284cb0e0963.js

openapi.318ba3d5a50b8d6990cb0284cb0e0963.js

261 ms

031.png

031.png

243 ms

021.png

021.png

155 ms

011.png

011.png

155 ms

041.png

041.png

253 ms

051.png

051.png

240 ms

06.png

06.png

254 ms

07.png

07.png

258 ms

08.png

08.png

257 ms

whatWeDo_01.png

whatWeDo_01.png

477 ms

whatWeDo_02.png

whatWeDo_02.png

481 ms

whatWeDo_03.png

whatWeDo_03.png

489 ms

01-1.jpg

01-1.jpg

377 ms

01-2.jpg

01-2.jpg

379 ms

01-3.jpg

01-3.jpg

380 ms

01-4.jpg

01-4.jpg

500 ms

roman.jpg

roman.jpg

502 ms

slide4.jpg

slide4.jpg

503 ms

slide_marina_2.jpg

slide_marina_2.jpg

616 ms

slide2.jpg

slide2.jpg

620 ms

slide_iliya_2.jpg

slide_iliya_2.jpg

619 ms

slide1.jpg

slide1.jpg

621 ms

giperactive.png

giperactive.png

743 ms

giper-art-2.png

giper-art-2.png

627 ms

+group_logo.png

+group_logo.png

741 ms

all.js

all.js

54 ms

logo.png

logo.png

734 ms

btn_write.png

btn_write.png

731 ms

li.png

li.png

738 ms

bg_tel.png

bg_tel.png

741 ms

circle.png

circle.png

855 ms

ic_blog.png

ic_blog.png

856 ms

pfdindisplaypro-bold-webfont.woff

pfdindisplaypro-bold-webfont.woff

834 ms

upload.gif

upload.gif

131 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

30 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

119 ms

widget_like.php

widget_like.php

313 ms

tag.js

tag.js

881 ms

all.js

all.js

23 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

9 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

55 ms

fastbutton

fastbutton

51 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

30 ms

544727282-postmessagerelay.js

544727282-postmessagerelay.js

25 ms

rpc:shindig_random.js

rpc:shindig_random.js

10 ms

developers.google.com

developers.google.com

228 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

5 ms

loader_nav210916458538_3.js

loader_nav210916458538_3.js

299 ms

lite.93f44416.css

lite.93f44416.css

653 ms

lang3_2.js

lang3_2.js

653 ms

c3d11fba.475e3ac7.js

c3d11fba.475e3ac7.js

511 ms

vkui.388c7a16.css

vkui.388c7a16.css

715 ms

xdm.js

xdm.js

549 ms

widgets.d2d14ebe.css

widgets.d2d14ebe.css

555 ms

al_like.js

al_like.js

559 ms

base.ec2ae8ae.css

base.ec2ae8ae.css

651 ms

lite.bcf10ece3464fec8b554bde483fa2494.js

lite.bcf10ece3464fec8b554bde483fa2494.js

342 ms

advert.gif

advert.gif

664 ms

like_widget.png

like_widget.png

80 ms

upload.gif

upload.gif

80 ms

sync_cookie_image_decide

sync_cookie_image_decide

144 ms

Accessibility Review

giperactive.ru accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

giperactive.ru best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

giperactive.ru SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Giperactive.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Giperactive.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

giperactive.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Giperactive. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: