Tools & Wizards About Us
gispipe.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 73

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

gispipe.com

GISpipe - GIS based EPANET and SWMM integration software.

Page Load Speed

6.9 sec in total

First Response

593 ms

Resources Loaded

6.1 sec

Page Rendered

169 ms

gispipe.com screenshot

About Website

Visit gispipe.com now to see the best up-to-date GISpipe content for Nigeria and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gispipe.com

GISpipe is a software tool for designing, analyzing and simulating water and sewage that integrates GIS based EPANET and SWMM..

Visit gispipe.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gispipe.com page load time and found that the first response time was 593 ms and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gispipe.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value11.2 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value22.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value18.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value950 ms

29/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.206

60/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.4 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gispipe.com

593 ms

en.gispipe.com

1346 ms

js

41 ms

style.min.css

393 ms

css

33 ms

Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Gispipe.com, 17% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source En.gispipe.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 81.3 kB (6%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gispipe.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 921.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 41.6 kB

  • Original 53.1 kB
  • After minification 47.7 kB
  • After compression 11.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.6 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 25.3 kB

  • Original 921.9 kB
  • After minification 896.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. GISpipe images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 10.0 kB

  • Original 245.5 kB
  • After minification 245.5 kB
  • After compression 235.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 4.4 kB

  • Original 107.1 kB
  • After minification 107.0 kB
  • After compression 102.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gispipe.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (68%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

17

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GISpipe. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gispipe.com

gispipe.com

593 ms

en.gispipe.com

en.gispipe.com

1346 ms

js

js

41 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

393 ms

css

css

33 ms

css

css

75 ms

css

css

55 ms

css

css

55 ms

css

css

55 ms

css

css

56 ms

css

css

57 ms

style.css

style.css

573 ms

editor-style.css

editor-style.css

574 ms

default.css

default.css

582 ms

nivo-slider.css

nivo-slider.css

586 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

590 ms

tm-rotator.css

tm-rotator.css

591 ms

animation.css

animation.css

763 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

764 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

774 ms

style-mixitup.css

style-mixitup.css

780 ms

prettyPhotoe735.css

prettyPhotoe735.css

785 ms

animation-style.css

animation-style.css

787 ms

style.css

style.css

952 ms

editor_media.css

editor_media.css

955 ms

style.css

style.css

967 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1173 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

980 ms

jquery.nivo.slider.js

jquery.nivo.slider.js

981 ms

custom.js

custom.js

1142 ms

jquery.quovolver.min.js

jquery.quovolver.min.js

1144 ms

bootstrap.js

bootstrap.js

1159 ms

owl.carousel.js

owl.carousel.js

1184 ms

jquery_013.js

jquery_013.js

1185 ms

jquery_003.js

jquery_003.js

1332 ms

screen.js

screen.js

1334 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto5152.js

jquery.prettyPhoto5152.js

1353 ms

custom-animation.js

custom-animation.js

1367 ms

script.js

script.js

1425 ms

postcode.v2.js

postcode.v2.js

76 ms

waterfalls-1081703_1920.jpg

waterfalls-1081703_1920.jpg

978 ms

q8anGQqrXyg

q8anGQqrXyg

145 ms

horseshoe-bend-4040_1920.jpg

horseshoe-bend-4040_1920.jpg

1547 ms

colorado-river-65521_1920.jpg

colorado-river-65521_1920.jpg

1778 ms

logo-3.png

logo-3.png

391 ms

mobile_nav_right.png

mobile_nav_right.png

392 ms

gb.png

gb.png

390 ms

kr.png

kr.png

391 ms

br.png

br.png

390 ms

loading.gif

loading.gif

390 ms

img_404.png

img_404.png

415 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

741 ms

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEwMOPIDU.ttf

jizaRExUiTo99u79D0KEwMOPIDU.ttf

18 ms

jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0O6tKB8a8zI.ttf

jizfRExUiTo99u79B_mh0O6tKB8a8zI.ttf

22 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf

28 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf

31 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf

33 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf

75 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf

33 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf

38 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf

71 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf

75 ms

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf

1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQVIT9d4cw.ttf

39 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

8 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

24 ms

base.js

base.js

47 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

130 ms

IB4KEXV8u-k_bkhU78jQUSA-hI9APhLpeQI7w2Y-FTg.js

IB4KEXV8u-k_bkhU78jQUSA-hI9APhLpeQI7w2Y-FTg.js

98 ms

embed.js

embed.js

39 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxPKTU1Kg.ttf

12 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9AMP6lQ.ttf

13 ms

id

id

86 ms

Create

Create

75 ms

GenerateIT

GenerateIT

15 ms

slide-nav.png

slide-nav.png

196 ms

Accessibility Review

gispipe.com accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

gispipe.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

gispipe.com SEO score

73

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gispipe.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gispipe.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gispipe.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of GISpipe. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: