Tools & Wizards About Us
glasscanopy.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 47% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

glasscanopy.com

B2B Lead Generation Services | glassCanopy (San Francisco)

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

14 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

684 ms

glasscanopy.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to glasscanopy.com homepage info - get ready to check GlassCanopy best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about glasscanopy.com

Content & lead generation for complex B2B sales. We market hard-to-describe products to hard-to-find audiences with B2B lead generation services.

Visit glasscanopy.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Glasscanopy.com page load time and found that the first response time was 14 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

glasscanopy.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

74/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.9 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,460 ms

15/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.02

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.0 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

glasscanopy.com

14 ms

glasscanopy.com

27 ms

style.min.css

639 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

53 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

50 ms

Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 28% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Glasscanopy.com, 50% (44 requests) were made to 149358063.v2.pressablecdn.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (639 ms) belongs to the original domain Glasscanopy.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 185.3 kB (2%)

Content Size

9.9 MB

After Optimization

9.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Glasscanopy.com main page is 9.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 9.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 70.6 kB

  • Original 90.3 kB
  • After minification 88.5 kB
  • After compression 19.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.6 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 80.6 kB

  • Original 9.2 MB
  • After minification 9.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. GlassCanopy images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 27.0 kB

  • Original 393.3 kB
  • After minification 393.2 kB
  • After compression 366.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 7.1 kB

  • Original 151.7 kB
  • After minification 151.6 kB
  • After compression 144.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Glasscanopy.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (65%)

Requests Now

80

After Optimization

28

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GlassCanopy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 21 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

glasscanopy.com

glasscanopy.com

14 ms

glasscanopy.com

glasscanopy.com

27 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

639 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

53 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

50 ms

pagenavi-css.css

pagenavi-css.css

53 ms

dashicons.min.css

dashicons.min.css

56 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

50 ms

style.css

style.css

70 ms

jquery-ui.css

jquery-ui.css

74 ms

styles.css

styles.css

72 ms

basic.min.css

basic.min.css

69 ms

theme-ie11.min.css

theme-ie11.min.css

78 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

99 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

92 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

82 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

78 ms

jquery.json.min.js

jquery.json.min.js

80 ms

gravityforms.min.js

gravityforms.min.js

82 ms

conditional_logic.min.js

conditional_logic.min.js

82 ms

utils.min.js

utils.min.js

84 ms

glasscanopy.com

glasscanopy.com

498 ms

formreset.min.css

formreset.min.css

84 ms

formsmain.min.css

formsmain.min.css

99 ms

readyclass.min.css

readyclass.min.css

100 ms

browsers.min.css

browsers.min.css

115 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

82 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

83 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

87 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

86 ms

api.js

api.js

111 ms

underscore.min.js

underscore.min.js

88 ms

main.js

main.js

85 ms

iframe_api

iframe_api

115 ms

content-slider.js

content-slider.js

85 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

101 ms

script.js

script.js

98 ms

placeholders.jquery.min.js

placeholders.jquery.min.js

97 ms

vendor-theme.min.js

vendor-theme.min.js

98 ms

scripts-theme.min.js

scripts-theme.min.js

98 ms

akismet-frontend.js

akismet-frontend.js

99 ms

e-202430.js

e-202430.js

78 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

100 ms

css

css

108 ms

style.css

style.css

37 ms

collapsible-widgets.css

collapsible-widgets.css

6 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

226 ms

hotjar-336649.js

hotjar-336649.js

225 ms

roundtrip.js

roundtrip.js

565 ms

glassCanopy_logo_transparent.png

glassCanopy_logo_transparent.png

97 ms

search_icon_header.png

search_icon_header.png

111 ms

logo-white.png

logo-white.png

173 ms

linkedin.png

linkedin.png

111 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

168 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

201 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

301 ms

PexetoIcons.woff

PexetoIcons.woff

34 ms

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf

memQYaGs126MiZpBA-UFUIcVXSCEkx2cmqvXlWq8tWZ0Pw86hd0Rk8ZkWVAexQ.ttf

298 ms

PexetoArrows.woff

PexetoArrows.woff

33 ms

track.js

track.js

183 ms

track.js

track.js

180 ms

loader.js

loader.js

153 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

215 ms

www-widgetapi.js

www-widgetapi.js

73 ms

01_target.svg

01_target.svg

271 ms

02_generate.svg

02_generate.svg

275 ms

03_turn.svg

03_turn.svg

108 ms

Funnel_Transparent_1-1.png

Funnel_Transparent_1-1.png

205 ms

Funnel_New_Mobile_V1.png

Funnel_New_Mobile_V1.png

204 ms

Funnel_Blue_Background.jpg

Funnel_Blue_Background.jpg

66 ms

eBook-Samples_healthcare_V4.png

eBook-Samples_healthcare_V4.png

96 ms

Campaign-Sample-Tech-for-Healthcare.png

Campaign-Sample-Tech-for-Healthcare.png

95 ms

campaign-sample_HealthSystem-and-Physicians-copy-1.png

campaign-sample_HealthSystem-and-Physicians-copy-1.png

106 ms

ebook-sample_HCP-copy-1.png

ebook-sample_HCP-copy-1.png

107 ms

campaign-sample_HCP-copy-1.png

campaign-sample_HCP-copy-1.png

95 ms

forth.png

forth.png

203 ms

enterprise04.png

enterprise04.png

208 ms

cyber04.png

cyber04.png

208 ms

newimagetechsamples.png

newimagetechsamples.png

206 ms

b2b.png

b2b.png

211 ms

cyber09.png

cyber09.png

209 ms

enterprise09.png

enterprise09.png

271 ms

eBook-Samples_healthcare_V13_LOWRES.png

eBook-Samples_healthcare_V13_LOWRES.png

271 ms

Header_gC_V3.2.jpg

Header_gC_V3.2.jpg

339 ms

cs-loader-w.gif

cs-loader-w.gif

208 ms

app.js

app.js

35 ms

track.gif

track.gif

109 ms

4606-342-10-7946.js

4606-342-10-7946.js

184 ms

Accessibility Review

glasscanopy.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

glasscanopy.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

glasscanopy.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Glasscanopy.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Glasscanopy.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

glasscanopy.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of GlassCanopy. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: