Tools & Wizards About Us
gmailesignin.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

Page Load Speed

5.9 sec in total

First Response

558 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

2.9 sec

gmailesignin.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to gmailesignin.com homepage info - get ready to check Gmailesignin best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about gmailesignin.com

Visit gmailesignin.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gmailesignin.com page load time and found that the first response time was 558 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gmailesignin.com performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

54/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

70/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value230 ms

86/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.1 s

63/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gmailesignin.com

558 ms

57135b98d60f56b13a1ca20f58a8275a.css

516 ms

63205.js

343 ms

jquery.min.js

600 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

348 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Gmailesignin.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Gmailesignin.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 49.3 kB (7%)

Content Size

690.5 kB

After Optimization

641.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Gmailesignin.com main page is 690.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 624.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 49.2 kB

  • Original 64.8 kB
  • After minification 62.7 kB
  • After compression 15.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.2 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 9 B

  • Original 624.9 kB
  • After minification 624.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gmailesignin images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 145 B

  • Original 728 B
  • After minification 728 B
  • After compression 583 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 145 B or 20% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (14%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

37

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gmailesignin. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gmailesignin.com

gmailesignin.com

558 ms

57135b98d60f56b13a1ca20f58a8275a.css

57135b98d60f56b13a1ca20f58a8275a.css

516 ms

63205.js

63205.js

343 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

600 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

348 ms

slick.js

slick.js

358 ms

web.js

web.js

352 ms

slicknav.js

slicknav.js

352 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

439 ms

bullet-hero-hl-dt-b.jpg

bullet-hero-hl-dt-b.jpg

519 ms

carbon-fibre.png

carbon-fibre.png

184 ms

camo-bg.jpg

camo-bg.jpg

690 ms

troops.jpg

troops.jpg

183 ms

camo.jpg

camo.jpg

354 ms

icon_top.png

icon_top.png

350 ms

logo1.jpg

logo1.jpg

253 ms

metal-ulsupp1.png

metal-ulsupp1.png

255 ms

vs-text1.png

vs-text1.png

399 ms

fabric-ulsupp.png

fabric-ulsupp.png

404 ms

sponsors-usd1.jpg

sponsors-usd1.jpg

426 ms

sponsors-e1.jpg

sponsors-e1.jpg

425 ms

gdeb-logo1.jpg

gdeb-logo1.jpg

561 ms

ge-aviation-logo1.jpg

ge-aviation-logo1.jpg

568 ms

sponsors-hs1.jpg

sponsors-hs1.jpg

576 ms

honeywell-logo1.jpg

honeywell-logo1.jpg

605 ms

huntingtonii-logo1.jpg

huntingtonii-logo1.jpg

606 ms

sponsors-pw1.jpg

sponsors-pw1.jpg

735 ms

raytheon-tech-logo1.jpg

raytheon-tech-logo1.jpg

735 ms

sponsors-ut1.jpg

sponsors-ut1.jpg

738 ms

products-metal-filter1.jpg

products-metal-filter1.jpg

749 ms

products-strainer1.jpg

products-strainer1.jpg

962 ms

products-all1.jpg

products-all1.jpg

789 ms

filter-housing1.jpg

filter-housing1.jpg

914 ms

mil-air1.jpg

mil-air1.jpg

913 ms

com-air1.jpg

com-air1.jpg

913 ms

marine1.jpg

marine1.jpg

923 ms

defense1.jpg

defense1.jpg

969 ms

raq-badge1.png

raq-badge1.png

1090 ms

defense-supply-award-richmond1.png

defense-supply-award-richmond1.png

1084 ms

defense-supply-columbus1.png

defense-supply-columbus1.png

1081 ms

about-submarine1.jpg

about-submarine1.jpg

1094 ms

made-in-usa1.jpg

made-in-usa1.jpg

1142 ms

sdvosb.png

sdvosb.png

1149 ms

print.css

print.css

176 ms

Accessibility Review

gmailesignin.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

gmailesignin.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

gmailesignin.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gmailesignin.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gmailesignin.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gmailesignin.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gmailesignin. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: