Tools & Wizards About Us
golf-finder.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

golf-finder.net

Adysis - Media Online. Online Video Advertising for Publishers | Maximize Revenue with Adysis

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

282 ms

Resources Loaded

4.2 sec

Page Rendered

215 ms

golf-finder.net screenshot

About Website

Visit golf-finder.net now to see the best up-to-date Golf Finder content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about golf-finder.net

Maximize your revenue with online video advertising for publishers with Adysis. Unlock the power of engaging video content and targeted ad placements to monetize your digital platform. Reach a vast au...

Visit golf-finder.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Golf-finder.net page load time and found that the first response time was 282 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

golf-finder.net performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.3 s

41/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value790 ms

37/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.02

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.9 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

golf-finder.net

282 ms

pohs-network.com

872 ms

M9BPyy8qSdUvLqnMSQUA.css

276 ms

M9bPKixNLarUMdBPyy8qSdUvTi7KLCgp1s_JzE4tDgZzdEz0k_Nzc1PzSnSLUgtyKvVyM_MA.js

330 ms

jsapi

56 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Golf-finder.net, 12% (8 requests) were made to Pohs-network.com and 11% (7 requests) were made to Image2.pubmatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Rt2401.infolinks.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 688.5 kB (67%)

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

332.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Golf-finder.net main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 807.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 51.3 kB

  • Original 62.4 kB
  • After minification 61.8 kB
  • After compression 11.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 4.0 kB

  • Original 17.3 kB
  • After minification 13.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Golf Finder needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.0 kB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 522.7 kB

  • Original 807.3 kB
  • After minification 807.3 kB
  • After compression 284.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 522.7 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 110.5 kB

  • Original 134.5 kB
  • After minification 133.1 kB
  • After compression 23.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Golf-finder.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 110.5 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (62%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Golf Finder. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

golf-finder.net

golf-finder.net

282 ms

pohs-network.com

pohs-network.com

872 ms

M9BPyy8qSdUvLqnMSQUA.css

M9BPyy8qSdUvLqnMSQUA.css

276 ms

M9bPKixNLarUMdBPyy8qSdUvTi7KLCgp1s_JzE4tDgZzdEz0k_Nzc1PzSnSLUgtyKvVyM_MA.js

M9bPKixNLarUMdBPyy8qSdUvTi7KLCgp1s_JzE4tDgZzdEz0k_Nzc1PzSnSLUgtyKvVyM_MA.js

330 ms

jsapi

jsapi

56 ms

fY5dDsMgDIMv1EGl7UKUhj-lhAUi1Ntv6x4mIbRHx_Fnr9oRN9DVciytaofUC5oTWB0xL3ctUaenAJ9KorLEMLv3uHtol_PQtTvaEti2rCP8o1RB8THXkXGQ1C98jP1-GokNtyLZhtmMnY33ZsO_mKunBwBU6W0RYjEZZoFLvQA.js

fY5dDsMgDIMv1EGl7UKUhj-lhAUi1Ntv6x4mIbRHx_Fnr9oRN9DVciytaofUC5oTWB0xL3ctUaenAJ9KorLEMLv3uHtol_PQtTvaEti2rCP8o1RB8THXkXGQ1C98jP1-GokNtyLZhtmMnY33ZsO_mKunBwBU6W0RYjEZZoFLvQA.js

445 ms

jsapi

jsapi

66 ms

M9YvzdTPKixNLarUK83US0xOzi9KyczP08vNzNMxRpUsSUwqBokDAA.js

M9YvzdTPKixNLarUK83US0xOzi9KyczP08vNzNMxRpUsSUwqBokDAA.js

281 ms

webfont.js

webfont.js

53 ms

css

css

42 ms

forte-webfont.svg

forte-webfont.svg

314 ms

bg_pattern_0.png

bg_pattern_0.png

156 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

123 ms

pohsnetwork.png

pohsnetwork.png

434 ms

vglnk.js

vglnk.js

16 ms

infolinks_main.js

infolinks_main.js

86 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

47 ms

o.js

o.js

45 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

35 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

36 ms

o

o

87 ms

collect

collect

61 ms

collect

collect

131 ms

collect

collect

62 ms

collect

collect

145 ms

user_sync.html

user_sync.html

113 ms

usersyncup-an.html

usersyncup-an.html

63 ms

ice.js

ice.js

171 ms

rum

rum

76 ms

Pug

Pug

66 ms

mapuser

mapuser

15 ms

sd

sd

20 ms

rum

rum

32 ms

m

m

69 ms

showad.js

showad.js

58 ms

pixel

pixel

22 ms

m

m

37 ms

relator

relator

26 ms

PugMaster

PugMaster

115 ms

14581653962981

14581653962981

55 ms

pm_match

pm_match

29 ms

pixel

pixel

30 ms

Pug

Pug

36 ms

usersync.aspx

usersync.aspx

27 ms

Pug

Pug

24 ms

Pug

Pug

45 ms

Pug

Pug

44 ms

Pug

Pug

36 ms

Pug

Pug

36 ms

FBLIS.html

FBLIS.html

45 ms

doq.htm

doq.htm

252 ms

mapuid

mapuid

14 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

168 ms

Pug

Pug

17 ms

ping

ping

24 ms

optimize

optimize

19 ms

batch

batch

21 ms

tap.php

tap.php

254 ms

pixel.gif

pixel.gif

34 ms

132 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

141 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

266 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

60 ms

getads.htm

getads.htm

1483 ms

loader-bg.png

loader-bg.png

40 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

88 ms

Accessibility Review

golf-finder.net accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

golf-finder.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

golf-finder.net SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Golf-finder.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Golf-finder.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

golf-finder.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Golf Finder. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: