5.2 sec in total
451 ms
4.4 sec
339 ms
Visit goodgraf.pl now to see the best up-to-date Goodgraf content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about goodgraf.pl
Jestem projektantem graficznym. Grafika jest moją pasją i zawodem, dlatego sądzę, że uczciwie mogę polecić Ci się do wykonania wszelkich projektów graficznych. Zarówno dla Ciebie, jak i dla Twojej fir...
Visit goodgraf.plWe analyzed Goodgraf.pl page load time and found that the first response time was 451 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
goodgraf.pl performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
12/100
10%
Value7.2 s
5/100
25%
Value8.8 s
15/100
10%
Value880 ms
32/100
30%
Value1.809
0/100
15%
Value8.8 s
35/100
10%
451 ms
656 ms
87 ms
295 ms
306 ms
Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Goodgraf.pl, 82% (77 requests) were made to Karpierz.me and 6% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (908 ms) relates to the external source Karpierz.me.
Page size can be reduced by 33.8 kB (14%)
237.8 kB
204.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Goodgraf.pl main page is 237.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 161.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 26.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.9 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 381 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Goodgraf needs image optimization as it can save up to 381 B or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 3.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Goodgraf.pl has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (70%)
74
22
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Goodgraf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 40 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
goodgraf.pl
451 ms
karpierz.me
656 ms
adsbygoogle.js
87 ms
css
295 ms
css
306 ms
style.css
307 ms
jquery.min.js
389 ms
wow.min.js
552 ms
smoothscroll.js
551 ms
animsition.js
551 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
550 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
551 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
551 ms
jquery.pagepiling.min.js
629 ms
scripts.js
629 ms
karpierz-logo.svg
621 ms
1.webp
627 ms
2.webp
626 ms
3.webp
631 ms
4.webp
664 ms
5.webp
669 ms
6.webp
663 ms
7.webp
670 ms
8.webp
671 ms
show_ads_impl.js
150 ms
zrt_lookup.html
282 ms
home.webp
597 ms
o-mnie.webp
618 ms
projekt1.webp
617 ms
projekt2.webp
616 ms
projekt3.webp
618 ms
projekt4.webp
617 ms
referencje.webp
811 ms
kontakt.webp
730 ms
bootstrap.min.css
727 ms
bootstrap-grid.min.css
732 ms
animate.css
742 ms
ionicons.min.css
738 ms
linearicons.css
841 ms
animsition.css
845 ms
magnific-popup.css
908 ms
jquery.pagepiling.css
907 ms
owl.carousel.css
905 ms
cookie.js
87 ms
integrator.js
113 ms
ads
84 ms
404.html
197 ms
base.css
115 ms
loading.css
116 ms
fade.css
115 ms
fade-up.css
116 ms
fade-up-sm.css
116 ms
fade-up-lg.css
185 ms
fade-down.css
224 ms
fade-down-sm.css
226 ms
fade-down-lg.css
227 ms
fade-left.css
229 ms
fade-left-sm.css
228 ms
fade-left-lg.css
297 ms
fade-right.css
335 ms
fade-right-sm.css
337 ms
fade-right-lg.css
337 ms
rotate.css
338 ms
rotate-sm.css
338 ms
rotate-lg.css
405 ms
flip-x.css
443 ms
flip-x-nr.css
446 ms
flip-x-fr.css
444 ms
flip-y.css
444 ms
flip-y-nr.css
444 ms
flip-y-fr.css
513 ms
zoom.css
551 ms
zoom-sm.css
532 ms
zoom-lg.css
528 ms
overlay-slide-top.css
531 ms
overlay-slide-bottom.css
530 ms
overlay-slide-left.css
600 ms
overlay-slide-right.css
637 ms
404
620 ms
404.html
576 ms
404.html
579 ms
404
118 ms
404
116 ms
quote.png
241 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff
388 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff
534 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aXw.woff
536 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aXw.woff
536 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aXw.woff
536 ms
ionicons.ttf
376 ms
Linearicons.ttf
815 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLucHtG.woff
220 ms
analytics.js
377 ms
sodar
183 ms
goodgraf.pl accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA progressbar elements do not have accessible names.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
goodgraf.pl best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
goodgraf.pl SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
PL
PL
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Goodgraf.pl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Polish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Goodgraf.pl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
goodgraf.pl
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Goodgraf. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: