19.8 sec in total
592 ms
18.8 sec
409 ms
Click here to check amazing Gopod content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gopod.cc
Established in 2006, Gopod Group Holding Limited is a nationally recognized high-tech enterprise that specializes in R&D, production and sales of computer
Visit gopod.ccWe analyzed Gopod.cc page load time and found that the first response time was 592 ms and then it took 19.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
gopod.cc performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
38/100
10%
Value5.5 s
18/100
25%
Value7.3 s
29/100
10%
Value1,940 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.735
6/100
15%
Value7.7 s
45/100
10%
592 ms
61 ms
694 ms
770 ms
1040 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Gopod.cc, 70% (42 requests) were made to Cdn.globalso.com and 18% (11 requests) were made to Globalso.site. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (18.2 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.globalso.com.
Page size can be reduced by 437.3 kB (13%)
3.3 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Gopod.cc main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 56.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.0 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 343.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Gopod needs image optimization as it can save up to 343.0 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 19.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 19.1 kB or 12% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 18.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gopod.cc needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.6 kB or 40% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (42%)
45
26
The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gopod. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gopod.cc
592 ms
js
61 ms
style.css
694 ms
public.css
770 ms
logo-357X32.png
1040 ms
%E5%B1%95%E4%BC%9A%E9%82%80%E8%AF%B7%E5%87%BD2024.jpg
1141 ms
USB-C-HUBS4.jpg
1645 ms
banner-31.jpg
1325 ms
banner-11.png
1658 ms
banner-21.jpg
2128 ms
11.png
1401 ms
2-new.png
1392 ms
3.jpg
1890 ms
4.jpg
1666 ms
5-new.png
8592 ms
62.jpg
3067 ms
index_ad_01.png
1792 ms
index_ad_02.png
1803 ms
index_ad_03.png
2219 ms
index_ad_04.png
1915 ms
shou-ye1.jpg
2356 ms
%E6%9C%AA%E6%A0%87%E9%A2%98-12.jpg
2372 ms
livechat.js
373 ms
form.js
374 ms
jquery.min.js
1249 ms
common.js
942 ms
public.js
843 ms
stats_init.js
710 ms
%E5%B1%95%E4%BD%8D%E5%9B%BE.png
2878 ms
%E9%A6%99%E6%B8%AF.jpg
18209 ms
%E5%BE%AE%E4%BF%A1%E6%88%AA%E5%9B%BE_20230226163429.jpg
2797 ms
ico_email.svg
837 ms
facebook.png
2794 ms
linkedin.png
2892 ms
twitter.png
2887 ms
youtube.png
3154 ms
2024828_inquiry_livechat_gopodcc
442 ms
online.aw
721 ms
all-m.gif
80 ms
search_btn.png
292 ms
dingzhihua.png
3038 ms
addr_icons.png
217 ms
title_pic.png
134 ms
icons01.png
170 ms
close.png
159 ms
show_btn.png
259 ms
2024828_inquiry_form_gopodcc
400 ms
search_btn_close.png
538 ms
opensans.woff
654 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
688 ms
from_livechat.css
8 ms
jquery.min.js
16 ms
layer.js
23 ms
group_oper.js
27 ms
validform.min.js
27 ms
jquery.cookie.js
26 ms
layer.css
55 ms
statistic.php
1423 ms
error2.html
518 ms
error.html
445 ms
gopod.cc accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
gopod.cc best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
gopod.cc SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gopod.cc can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gopod.cc main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gopod.cc
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gopod. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: