Tools & Wizards About Us
graphicimaging.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 77

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 44% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

graphicimaging.net

Graphic Imaging Services Inc. - Document Management - Scanning

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

129 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

852 ms

graphicimaging.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Graphic Imaging content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about graphicimaging.net

As experts in document imaging services and capture of digital data, we have the experience and technology to help with document challenges.

Visit graphicimaging.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Graphicimaging.net page load time and found that the first response time was 129 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

graphicimaging.net performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

26/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.7 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,910 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.122

84/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

graphicimaging.net

129 ms

graphicimaging.net

188 ms

www.graphicimaging.net

264 ms

style.min.css

214 ms

styles.css

167 ms

Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (64 requests) were addressed to the original Graphicimaging.net, 7% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Graphicimaging.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 352.8 kB (10%)

Content Size

3.6 MB

After Optimization

3.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Graphicimaging.net main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 79.7 kB

  • Original 98.5 kB
  • After minification 93.8 kB
  • After compression 18.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.7 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 262.6 kB

  • Original 2.6 MB
  • After minification 2.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Graphic Imaging images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 5.2 kB

  • Original 720.6 kB
  • After minification 720.6 kB
  • After compression 715.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 5.3 kB

  • Original 198.9 kB
  • After minification 194.3 kB
  • After compression 193.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Graphicimaging.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (44%)

Requests Now

80

After Optimization

45

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Graphic Imaging. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

graphicimaging.net

graphicimaging.net

129 ms

graphicimaging.net

graphicimaging.net

188 ms

www.graphicimaging.net

www.graphicimaging.net

264 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

214 ms

styles.css

styles.css

167 ms

dc-style.css

dc-style.css

184 ms

woocommerce-layout.css

woocommerce-layout.css

194 ms

woocommerce.css

woocommerce.css

185 ms

modules-style.css

modules-style.css

86 ms

magnific-popup.min.css

magnific-popup.min.css

156 ms

frontend.css

frontend.css

203 ms

index.min.css

index.min.css

210 ms

style-static.min.css

style-static.min.css

311 ms

style.css

style.css

234 ms

wpo-minify-header-c78e53f5.min.js

wpo-minify-header-c78e53f5.min.js

284 ms

js

js

79 ms

slick.js

slick.js

46 ms

et-core-unified-11689.min.css

et-core-unified-11689.min.css

253 ms

wc-blocks.css

wc-blocks.css

220 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

218 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

246 ms

wpo-minify-footer-b3a05cf5.min.js

wpo-minify-footer-b3a05cf5.min.js

487 ms

api.js

api.js

36 ms

wpo-minify-footer-24312e6e.min.js

wpo-minify-footer-24312e6e.min.js

271 ms

wpo-minify-footer-74d20feb.min.js

wpo-minify-footer-74d20feb.min.js

483 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

482 ms

wpo-minify-footer-69f01b82.min.js

wpo-minify-footer-69f01b82.min.js

483 ms

HkquRYwzaqo

HkquRYwzaqo

500 ms

hQiCvSDUq38

hQiCvSDUq38

691 ms

embed

embed

493 ms

logo.png

logo.png

486 ms

scanner-icon-011-wht.png

scanner-icon-011-wht.png

484 ms

cad-icon-01-wht.png

cad-icon-01-wht.png

486 ms

construction-icon-1-white.png

construction-icon-1-white.png

485 ms

scanner-printer-repair-icon-01.png

scanner-printer-repair-icon-01.png

485 ms

preloader.gif

preloader.gif

483 ms

scanning.gif

scanning.gif

689 ms

onsite-1.gif

onsite-1.gif

1140 ms

Chuck-scanning-cropped-e1701110339101.jpg

Chuck-scanning-cropped-e1701110339101.jpg

678 ms

GIS-Blue-Print-Bkgrd-04.jpg

GIS-Blue-Print-Bkgrd-04.jpg

685 ms

2024-Box-to-Bytes-6.png

2024-Box-to-Bytes-6.png

736 ms

Canon-DR-G2090-150x150.jpg

Canon-DR-G2090-150x150.jpg

576 ms

Contex-IQ-Quattro-X-150x150.png

Contex-IQ-Quattro-X-150x150.png

683 ms

Kodak-s2085-150x150.jpg

Kodak-s2085-150x150.jpg

828 ms

Canon-imageprograf-gp-4100s-150x150.jpg

Canon-imageprograf-gp-4100s-150x150.jpg

835 ms

ABA24_Gold_Winner-300x300.webp

ABA24_Gold_Winner-300x300.webp

839 ms

Serv-01.jpg

Serv-01.jpg

838 ms

Serv-02.jpg

Serv-02.jpg

838 ms

Serv-03.jpg

Serv-03.jpg

1266 ms

Serv-04.jpg

Serv-04.jpg

1265 ms

Scanners-Home-Solutions.jpg

Scanners-Home-Solutions.jpg

1266 ms

records.png

records.png

1267 ms

recycle-300x200-tr-01.png

recycle-300x200-tr-01.png

1267 ms

Consumable-Kits-1.png

Consumable-Kits-1.png

1268 ms

2024-Infographic-2.png

2024-Infographic-2.png

1277 ms

stars-5.png

stars-5.png

1269 ms

Quote-Logos-e1703189305582.png

Quote-Logos-e1703189305582.png

1269 ms

AIIM-300x96.png

AIIM-300x96.png

1270 ms

CIP_Logo_4color-300x83.jpg

CIP_Logo_4color-300x83.jpg

1272 ms

ESRI.png

ESRI.png

1270 ms

WBE.png

WBE.png

1271 ms

SBE.png

SBE.png

1157 ms

FEDBIZ-150x150.png

FEDBIZ-150x150.png

1156 ms

Capturep.png

Capturep.png

1156 ms

ECMp.png

ECMp.png

1155 ms

NUH9SoSxbL-5dd8536e.js

NUH9SoSxbL-5dd8536e.js

715 ms

js

js

161 ms

modules.woff

modules.woff

844 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

297 ms

NGIS.png

NGIS.png

797 ms

HIPAA-compliant-300x300.png

HIPAA-compliant-300x300.png

797 ms

PCI-300x233.png

PCI-300x233.png

798 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

173 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

219 ms

base.js

base.js

377 ms

js

js

356 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

199 ms

ProcessStats.aspx

ProcessStats.aspx

427 ms

collect

collect

524 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

418 ms

vD-PFjxSijoP4-I0oY5JcElr_81RPxK9SqvIhUi9qS8.js

vD-PFjxSijoP4-I0oY5JcElr_81RPxK9SqvIhUi9qS8.js

176 ms

embed.js

embed.js

122 ms

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

woocommerce-smallscreen.css

219 ms

id

id

95 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

207 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

207 ms

Accessibility Review

graphicimaging.net accessibility score

77

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

graphicimaging.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

graphicimaging.net SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Graphicimaging.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Graphicimaging.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

graphicimaging.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Graphic Imaging. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: