Tools & Wizards About Us
gtascraper.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 60

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    76% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

gtascraper.com

Technological Predictions: Future of AI Is Low-Code | AppMaster

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

277 ms

Resources Loaded

980 ms

Page Rendered

2.4 sec

gtascraper.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to gtascraper.com homepage info - get ready to check Gtascraper best content right away, or after learning these important things about gtascraper.com

Low-code and no-code platforms make it easy for small and medium companies to get easy access to AI technologies.

Visit gtascraper.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gtascraper.com page load time and found that the first response time was 277 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gtascraper.com performance score

60

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

86/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

84/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,330 ms

17/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.14

79/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.3 s

39/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

technological-predictions-future-of-ai-is-low-code

277 ms

logo_full.2779212.svg

163 ms

icons.svg

374 ms

header-course.3aaea7e.png

429 ms

us-flag.5edf8c1.svg

430 ms

Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Gtascraper.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (496 ms) relates to the external source Appmaster.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 327.5 kB (74%)

Content Size

440.8 kB

After Optimization

113.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Gtascraper.com main page is 440.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 400.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 327.5 kB

  • Original 400.1 kB
  • After minification 394.7 kB
  • After compression 72.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 327.5 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 40.6 kB
  • After minification 40.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gtascraper images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (59%)

Requests Now

44

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gtascraper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

technological-predictions-future-of-ai-is-low-code

technological-predictions-future-of-ai-is-low-code

277 ms

logo_full.2779212.svg

logo_full.2779212.svg

163 ms

icons.svg

icons.svg

374 ms

header-course.3aaea7e.png

header-course.3aaea7e.png

429 ms

us-flag.5edf8c1.svg

us-flag.5edf8c1.svg

430 ms

ko-flag.309ee53.svg

ko-flag.309ee53.svg

432 ms

zh-flag.35210ea.svg

zh-flag.35210ea.svg

435 ms

pt-flag.7d790c6.svg

pt-flag.7d790c6.svg

425 ms

hi-flag.cae64db.svg

hi-flag.cae64db.svg

402 ms

check-icon.svg

check-icon.svg

449 ms

4c583b8.js

4c583b8.js

377 ms

621ff96.js

621ff96.js

375 ms

39f2ae2.js

39f2ae2.js

358 ms

105aa7a.js

105aa7a.js

358 ms

56136d5.js

56136d5.js

399 ms

fe95038.js

fe95038.js

382 ms

3c8a43c.js

3c8a43c.js

380 ms

a922b67.js

a922b67.js

379 ms

4a499c5.js

4a499c5.js

381 ms

5839905.js

5839905.js

412 ms

8a51ec2.js

8a51ec2.js

398 ms

12eeee4.js

12eeee4.js

414 ms

8358984.js

8358984.js

423 ms

739ae7c.js

739ae7c.js

399 ms

25be5e6.js

25be5e6.js

417 ms

80cd31c.js

80cd31c.js

415 ms

3f69dd1.js

3f69dd1.js

420 ms

3c6b7de.js

3c6b7de.js

418 ms

31024c1.js

31024c1.js

420 ms

33f39d1.js

33f39d1.js

446 ms

0f7b1fb.js

0f7b1fb.js

448 ms

5163b52.js

5163b52.js

486 ms

d19f1d7.js

d19f1d7.js

462 ms

a34cd98.js

a34cd98.js

462 ms

0c31580.js

0c31580.js

468 ms

f9ff029.js

f9ff029.js

496 ms

bae0814.js

bae0814.js

480 ms

246 ms

box-logo.1e56cf1.svg

box-logo.1e56cf1.svg

233 ms

powered-logo.cae3649.svg

powered-logo.cae3649.svg

196 ms

logo_footer.275d5fd.svg

logo_footer.275d5fd.svg

263 ms

medal-performer.b801d1f.svg

medal-performer.b801d1f.svg

256 ms

medal-performer-summer.8b627ca.svg

medal-performer-summer.8b627ca.svg

237 ms

top-post-badge.8cb4fff.svg

top-post-badge.8cb4fff.svg

192 ms

earth-ico.32aab03.svg

earth-ico.32aab03.svg

246 ms

Accessibility Review

gtascraper.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

gtascraper.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

gtascraper.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gtascraper.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gtascraper.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gtascraper.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gtascraper. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: