Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 60

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

hafele.co

Hafele, Shop Hafele Cabinet Hardware and Organization Solutions for the Kitchen, Bath and Closet | KitchenSource.com

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

102 ms

Resources Loaded

815 ms

Page Rendered

628 ms

hafele.co screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Hafele content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about hafele.co

Hafele’s collection of top-of-the-line hardware, organization solutions and home accessories will make life easier while enhancing your interiors. All of these innovative pieces are made from the best...

Visit hafele.co

Key Findings

We analyzed Hafele.co page load time and found that the first response time was 102 ms and then it took 1.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hafele.co performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

81/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value320 ms

76/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.528

14/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.2 s

62/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

hafele.co

102 ms

ha-welcome.html

50 ms

ha-welcome.html

76 ms

js

58 ms

global_attribute_page.css

14 ms

Our browser made a total of 136 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Hafele.co, 39% (53 requests) were made to Im-7.eefa.co and 37% (50 requests) were made to Im-x.eefa.co. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (296 ms) relates to the external source Im-x.eefa.co.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 277.9 kB (13%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Hafele.co main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 80.6 kB

  • Original 94.8 kB
  • After minification 90.3 kB
  • After compression 14.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 29.6 kB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hafele images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 89.3 kB

  • Original 238.3 kB
  • After minification 238.1 kB
  • After compression 149.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 89.3 kB or 37% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 78.4 kB

  • Original 101.3 kB
  • After minification 83.2 kB
  • After compression 23.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hafele.co needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 78.4 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (21%)

Requests Now

131

After Optimization

104

The browser has sent 131 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hafele. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

hafele.co accessibility score

60

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

hafele.co best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

hafele.co SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hafele.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hafele.co main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hafele. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: