2.7 sec in total
159 ms
2.2 sec
313 ms
Visit igrad.com now to see the best up-to-date IGrad content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about igrad.com
Reach your financial goals one step at a time
Visit igrad.comWe analyzed Igrad.com page load time and found that the first response time was 159 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
igrad.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value12.8 s
0/100
10%
Value18.4 s
0/100
25%
Value16.7 s
0/100
10%
Value4,160 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.052
99/100
15%
Value27.5 s
0/100
10%
159 ms
333 ms
65 ms
29 ms
30 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 21% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Igrad.com, 48% (35 requests) were made to Static.igrad.com and 11% (8 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Igrad.com.
Page size can be reduced by 927.7 kB (38%)
2.5 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Igrad.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 21.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.7 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.1 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 122.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. IGrad images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 392.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 392.1 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 391.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Igrad.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 391.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (59%)
59
24
The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IGrad. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
igrad.com
159 ms
www.igrad.com
333 ms
ga.js
65 ms
css
29 ms
styles.css
30 ms
styles-new.css
21 ms
css
114 ms
css
97 ms
__utm.gif
39 ms
__utm.gif
16 ms
__utm.gif
22 ms
__utm.gif
21 ms
jquery-ui-autocomplete.css
5 ms
font-awesome.min.css
150 ms
FusionCharts.min.js
6 ms
owl.carousel.css
6 ms
owl.theme.css
9 ms
jquery.min.js
34 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.myCustom.min.js
11 ms
jquery.tinycarousel.min.js
10 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
9 ms
ticker.js
10 ms
jquery.validate.min.1.12.0.js
10 ms
supersized.core.3.2.1.min.js
10 ms
jquery.maskedinput.min.js
10 ms
jwplayer.js
12 ms
plupload.full.js
10 ms
handlebars.min.js
11 ms
jquery.zclip.min.js
8 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
10 ms
jquery.scrolldepth.min.js
7 ms
jquery-cookie.js
10 ms
script.min.js
10 ms
conversion.js
18 ms
j.php
82 ms
root-back.jpg
79 ms
heading-line.jpg
66 ms
heading-line-active.jpg
66 ms
nav-home.png
66 ms
search-input.png
68 ms
logo.png
68 ms
footer-back.jpg
68 ms
follow-icons.png
67 ms
google-plus.png
67 ms
w3c.png
67 ms
banner-igrad-one.jpg
759 ms
banner-igrad-two.jpg
817 ms
banner-igrad-three.jpg
751 ms
family.png
387 ms
loans.png
352 ms
career.png
305 ms
testimonial-one.jpg
904 ms
testimonial-two.jpg
872 ms
testimonial-three.jpg
901 ms
hands.jpg
1566 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
847 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
327 ms
bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf
91 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
92 ms
8KhZd3VQBtXTAznvKjw-ky3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
106 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
106 ms
100 ms
__utm.gif
30 ms
__utm.gif
19 ms
__utm.gif
18 ms
overlay.png
16 ms
v.gif
16 ms
54 ms
7m8l7TlFO-S3VkhHuR0at50EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
28 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
21 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
332 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
328 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
448 ms
igrad.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
igrad.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
igrad.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Igrad.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Igrad.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
igrad.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of IGrad. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: