5.5 sec in total
2.2 sec
3 sec
319 ms
Click here to check amazing Imafter content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about imafter.com
Visit imafter.comWe analyzed Imafter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.2 sec and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
imafter.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value4.1 s
46/100
25%
Value6.1 s
45/100
10%
Value40 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.151
75/100
15%
Value5.1 s
76/100
10%
2172 ms
92 ms
179 ms
174 ms
24 ms
Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Imafter.com, 17% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Imafter.com.
Page size can be reduced by 255.8 kB (38%)
675.1 kB
419.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Imafter.com main page is 675.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 387.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 13.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.8 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 45.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Imafter needs image optimization as it can save up to 45.0 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 137.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 137.7 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 59.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Imafter.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 59.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (58%)
24
10
The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Imafter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
imafter.com
2172 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
92 ms
style.css
179 ms
cli-style.css
174 ms
css
24 ms
font-awesome.min.css
13 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
176 ms
genesis-extender-minified.css
172 ms
style.css
169 ms
jquery.js
262 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
260 ms
cookielawinfo.js
260 ms
responsive-menu.js
258 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
346 ms
lightbox.js
349 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
364 ms
wp-embed.min.js
358 ms
body-bg.jpg
181 ms
imafter-search-1140x725.jpg
499 ms
imafter-womens-clothes-fashion-1140x725.jpg
409 ms
imafter-mens-clothes-fashion-1140x725.jpg
261 ms
imafter-womens-clothes-fashionsmall.jpg
289 ms
imafter-mens-clothes-fashionsmall.jpg
171 ms
overlay.png
187 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6ngV_pQ1T3xN3K1c3sB361us.ttf
114 ms
RFda8w1V0eDZheqfcyQ4EInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
116 ms
ZvcMqxEwPfh2qDWBPxn6nn06qf9KHRHwsVx7iw5MXmY.ttf
112 ms
4A-myfZX6oDr9CtSTkTGig.ttf
116 ms
rapsGf8n-DpRu9kcmAAciA.ttf
115 ms
bg_control_nav.png
92 ms
imafter.com accessibility score
imafter.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
imafter.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Imafter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Imafter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
imafter.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Imafter. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: