7.3 sec in total
915 ms
6.1 sec
291 ms
Click here to check amazing Improveeze content for France. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about improveeze.com
Sell beyond the limits with Phygital. In-store terminals, mobile seller, we help you in your Phygitale strategy.
Visit improveeze.comWe analyzed Improveeze.com page load time and found that the first response time was 915 ms and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
improveeze.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.6 s
2/100
10%
Value22.3 s
0/100
25%
Value26.0 s
0/100
10%
Value8,570 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.369
29/100
15%
Value29.0 s
0/100
10%
915 ms
204 ms
195 ms
214 ms
198 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (77 requests) were addressed to the original Improveeze.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Improveeze.com.
Page size can be reduced by 919.0 kB (37%)
2.5 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Improveeze.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 58.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.5 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 254.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Improveeze needs image optimization as it can save up to 254.0 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 447.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 447.8 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 158.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Improveeze.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 158.8 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (46%)
85
46
The browser has sent 85 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Improveeze. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.improveeze.com
915 ms
style.css
204 ms
superfish.css
195 ms
prettyPhoto.css
214 ms
dc-tips.css
198 ms
common.css
357 ms
slider_progress.css
195 ms
override.css
294 ms
directions.css
296 ms
nggallery.css
349 ms
shutter-reloaded.css
299 ms
styles.css
306 ms
jquery.js
571 ms
js
25 ms
plugin-framework.js
430 ms
shutter-reloaded.js
382 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
509 ms
ngg.slideshow.min.js
448 ms
comment-reply.js
461 ms
jquery.easing.1.2.js
496 ms
cufon-yui.js
516 ms
slider_progress.js
612 ms
superfish.js
562 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
616 ms
jquery-dc-tips.1.0.js
610 ms
common.js
730 ms
swfobject.js
674 ms
Bebas_Neue_400.font.js
681 ms
widgets.js
86 ms
jquery.form.min.js
657 ms
scripts.js
650 ms
www.sellsy.com
546 ms
ga.js
79 ms
logo_fullwidth21.jpg
253 ms
search.png
191 ms
youtube_32.png
196 ms
twitter_32.png
207 ms
facebook_32.png
206 ms
linkedin_32.png
194 ms
vimeo_32.png
253 ms
rss_32.png
259 ms
bg_menu.gif
252 ms
12.gif
253 ms
CatalogueInteractifthumb.jpg
254 ms
CatalogueInteractifthumbblack.jpg
286 ms
FINALSLIDE_mothumb.jpg
314 ms
FINALSLIDE_mothumbblack.jpg
330 ms
Vitrine-Interactive-sublimeezethumb.jpg
329 ms
Vitrine-Interactive-sublimeezethumbblack.jpg
375 ms
Etude-Magasins-Connectesthumb.jpg
374 ms
Etude-Magasins-Connectesthumbblack.jpg
395 ms
SONAR-1024x576thumb.jpg
412 ms
SONAR-1024x576thumbblack.jpg
422 ms
prev.png
417 ms
pause.png
447 ms
play.png
455 ms
next.png
495 ms
inside_white_right.png
510 ms
top_white_right.png
532 ms
leBlog_img.jpg
553 ms
rss.png
545 ms
dot_l1.png
570 ms
cs_img.jpg
592 ms
gt_img.jpg
633 ms
bottom_white_right.png
632 ms
14.gif
676 ms
14s.gif
646 ms
bg_widgetized.png
654 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
131 ms
CatalogueInteractif.png
1500 ms
FINALSLIDE_mo.png
1542 ms
Vitrine-Interactive-sublimeeze.png
1091 ms
Etude-Magasins-Connectes.png
947 ms
SONAR-1024x576.jpg
872 ms
__utm.gif
15 ms
thumb.php
522 ms
thumb.php
617 ms
thumb.php
719 ms
thumb.php
944 ms
thumb.php
910 ms
thumb.php
981 ms
arrows.png
1003 ms
shadow.png
1073 ms
follow_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.fr.html
51 ms
info.json
104 ms
jot
91 ms
improveeze.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
improveeze.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
improveeze.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Improveeze.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Improveeze.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
improveeze.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Improveeze. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: