Tools & Wizards About Us
inditel.es screenshot

Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

inditel.es

Inditel | Suministros Industriales | Expertos en válvulas

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

743 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

222 ms

inditel.es screenshot

About Website

Visit inditel.es now to see the best up-to-date Inditel content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about inditel.es

Inditel, especializalistas en sector industrial y petroquímico. Expertos en el suministro de válvulas.

Visit inditel.es

Key Findings

We analyzed Inditel.es page load time and found that the first response time was 743 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

inditel.es performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value9.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.5 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value310 ms

78/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.367

29/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.7 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

743 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

235 ms

settings.css

348 ms

core-styles.css

765 ms

css

23 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Inditel.es, 9% (4 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (883 ms) belongs to the original domain Inditel.es.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (41%)

Content Size

3.5 MB

After Optimization

2.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Inditel.es main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 74.9 kB

  • Original 93.6 kB
  • After minification 88.6 kB
  • After compression 18.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.9 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Inditel images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 541.0 kB

  • Original 839.4 kB
  • After minification 823.1 kB
  • After compression 298.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 541.0 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 789.2 kB

  • Original 902.5 kB
  • After minification 890.7 kB
  • After compression 113.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Inditel.es needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 789.2 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (50%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Inditel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

743 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

235 ms

settings.css

settings.css

348 ms

core-styles.css

core-styles.css

765 ms

css

css

23 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

792 ms

components-production.min.css

components-production.min.css

777 ms

theme-options-production.css

theme-options-production.css

567 ms

style.css

style.css

247 ms

custom.css

custom.css

307 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

556 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

374 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

546 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

585 ms

smoothscroll.js

smoothscroll.js

366 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

498 ms

core-scripts.js

core-scripts.js

763 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

528 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

569 ms

components-production.min.js

components-production.min.js

545 ms

embed

embed

334 ms

embed

embed

494 ms

inditel-default.png

inditel-default.png

254 ms

inditel-white.png

inditel-white.png

147 ms

control-seal.jpg

control-seal.jpg

147 ms

exakta.jpg

exakta.jpg

255 ms

goodwin.jpg

goodwin.jpg

265 ms

goodwinflowcontrol.jpg

goodwinflowcontrol.jpg

380 ms

indra.jpg

indra.jpg

377 ms

advanced.jpg

advanced.jpg

379 ms

lvf.jpg

lvf.jpg

378 ms

quam.jpg

quam.jpg

376 ms

Brooksbank.jpg

Brooksbank.jpg

388 ms

sungov.jpg

sungov.jpg

496 ms

tai.jpg

tai.jpg

506 ms

font

font

88 ms

home_02.jpg

home_02.jpg

781 ms

home_03.jpg

home_03.jpg

875 ms

home_01.jpg

home_01.jpg

883 ms

js

js

38 ms

search.js

search.js

7 ms

geometry.js

geometry.js

10 ms

main.js

main.js

16 ms

Accessibility Review

inditel.es accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

inditel.es best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

inditel.es SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inditel.es can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Inditel.es main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

inditel.es

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Inditel. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: