Access ingab.ru. Студия перманентного макияжа в Москве — салон Инги Бабицкой

ingab.ru screenshot

16

Performance

Renders faster than
30% of other websites
89

Accessibility

Visual factors better than
that of 71% of websites
67

Best Practices

More advanced features
available than in
24% of websites
91

SEO

Google-friendlier than
70% of websites

First Response

493 ms

Resources Loaded

5.8 sec

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

ingab.ru screenshot

About Website

Welcome to ingab.ru homepage info - get ready to check Ingab best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about ingab.ru

Школа-студия перманентного макияжа в Москве. Лучшая студия татуажа Инги Бабицкой. Успешных преображений — 6500+. Обучение от опытных профессионалов. Звоните: ☎ +7 (985) 787-91-74.

Visit ingab.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Ingab.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 493 ms and then it took 7.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.4 s

27/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,520 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.491

17/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.7 s

28/100

10%

ingab.ru

493 ms

ingab.ru

1017 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

124 ms

style.min.css

248 ms

style.min.css

360 ms

Our browser made a total of 160 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (151 requests) were addressed to the original Ingab.ru, 2% (3 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Ingab.ru.

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Ingab.ru main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-91%

Potential reduce by 252.5 kB

Original 276.1 kB
After minification 211.1 kB
After compression 23.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 65.0 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 252.5 kB or 91% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 52.7 kB

Original 1.5 MB
After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ingab images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 4.1 kB

Original 254.1 kB
After minification 254.1 kB
After compression 250.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 74.5 kB

Original 200.5 kB
After minification 200.3 kB
After compression 126.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ingab.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 74.5 kB or 37% of the original size.

Requests Now

144

After Optimization

96

The browser has sent 144 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ingab. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

High

Serves images with low resolution

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

Search Engine Optimization Advices

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

High

Links are not crawlable

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

RU
Language Claimed

RU
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ingab.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ingab.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ingab.ru

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ingab. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: