Tools & Wizards About Us
inkilap.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 7

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    22% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

inkilap.com

İnkılap Kitabevi - Kitap Sektöründen 97 Yıllık Tecrübe

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

189 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

145 ms

inkilap.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to inkilap.com homepage info - get ready to check Inkilap best content for Turkey right away, or after learning these important things about inkilap.com

İnkılap Kitabevi - Kitap Sektöründen 97 Yıllık Tecrübe

Visit inkilap.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Inkilap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 189 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

inkilap.com performance score

7

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,120 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.427

0/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.2 s

12/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

inkilap.com

189 ms

inkilap.com

1765 ms

ticimax.jquery.min.js

46 ms

GetGlobalModelJS

295 ms

js

70 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Inkilap.com, 35% (17 requests) were made to Static.ticimax.cloud and 21% (10 requests) were made to Cdn.ticimax.cloud. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Inkilap.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 544.1 kB (44%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

684.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Inkilap.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 691.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 542.8 kB

  • Original 691.1 kB
  • After minification 690.0 kB
  • After compression 148.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 542.8 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3 B

  • Original 256.0 kB
  • After minification 256.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Inkilap images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 951 B

  • Original 212.9 kB
  • After minification 212.9 kB
  • After compression 211.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 352 B

  • Original 69.0 kB
  • After minification 69.0 kB
  • After compression 68.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Inkilap.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (64%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Inkilap. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

inkilap.com

inkilap.com

189 ms

inkilap.com

inkilap.com

1765 ms

ticimax.jquery.min.js

ticimax.jquery.min.js

46 ms

GetGlobalModelJS

GetGlobalModelJS

295 ms

js

js

70 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

111 ms

fbevents.js

fbevents.js

18 ms

js

js

71 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

33 ms

style.css

style.css

95 ms

blank.png

blank.png

26 ms

logokucuk.png

logokucuk.png

125 ms

waterloo-81-a64.png

waterloo-81-a64.png

131 ms

bildirim-logo.png

bildirim-logo.png

453 ms

mic.gif

mic.gif

100 ms

collect

collect

15 ms

collect

collect

88 ms

search.svg

search.svg

53 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

130 ms

yuzyilin-suclusu-blaze-452f-b.jpg

yuzyilin-suclusu-blaze-452f-b.jpg

30 ms

eglence-parki-ba7a-5.jpg

eglence-parki-ba7a-5.jpg

19 ms

livaneli-kitapligi-seti-2-aa7-40.jpg

livaneli-kitapligi-seti-2-aa7-40.jpg

22 ms

bildirim-logo.png

bildirim-logo.png

172 ms

2024-astrosifa-ajandasi-48525c.png

2024-astrosifa-ajandasi-48525c.png

28 ms

collect

collect

16 ms

blank.png

blank.png

28 ms

logo-60x20px.svg

logo-60x20px.svg

23 ms

js

js

50 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

72 ms

Temp.js

Temp.js

28 ms

ticimax.coreV2.min.css

ticimax.coreV2.min.css

74 ms

ticimax.structureV2.min.js

ticimax.structureV2.min.js

73 ms

ticimax.handlebar.min.js

ticimax.handlebar.min.js

72 ms

ticimax.globalV2.min.js

ticimax.globalV2.min.js

73 ms

main.js

main.js

195 ms

webfont.js

webfont.js

31 ms

js

js

69 ms

ec.js

ec.js

9 ms

inkilapfont.css

inkilapfont.css

37 ms

inkilapfont.css

inkilapfont.css

34 ms

vef91dfe02fce4ee0ad053f6de4f175db1715022073587

vef91dfe02fce4ee0ad053f6de4f175db1715022073587

84 ms

inkilapfont-Medium.woff

inkilapfont-Medium.woff

223 ms

inkilapfont-Roman.woff

inkilapfont-Roman.woff

327 ms

inkilapfont-Light.woff

inkilapfont-Light.woff

302 ms

inkilapfont-Heavy.woff

inkilapfont-Heavy.woff

295 ms

inkilapfont-Black.woff

inkilapfont-Black.woff

260 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

295 ms

watch.js

watch.js

6 ms

Accessibility Review

inkilap.com accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

inkilap.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

inkilap.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    TR

  • Language Claimed

    TR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inkilap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Turkish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Inkilap.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

inkilap.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Inkilap. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: