Tools & Wizards About Us
inkitup.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 59

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

inkitup.com

Embroidery Westchester | Screen Printing Bergen County NJ | Custom Logo Apparel Fairfield County CT

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

247 ms

Resources Loaded

1.2 sec

Page Rendered

154 ms

inkitup.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to inkitup.com homepage info - get ready to check Inkitup best content right away, or after learning these important things about inkitup.com

Get a no-obligation quote today! Call (914) 740-4920 or click below. Get a Quote Westchester #1 Screen Printing and Embroidery Shop Family owned and operated INK IT UP LTD. Screen Printing and Embroid...

Visit inkitup.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Inkitup.com page load time and found that the first response time was 247 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

inkitup.com performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

24/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

54/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.621

10/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.5 s

58/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.inkitup.com

247 ms

validationEngine.jquery.css

148 ms

style.min.css

144 ms

styles.css

160 ms

front-flex.min.css

159 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Inkitup.com, 85% (41 requests) were made to Fabdb1.p3cdn1.secureserver.net and 4% (2 requests) were made to Netdna.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (247 ms) belongs to the original domain Inkitup.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 120.3 kB (20%)

Content Size

616.4 kB

After Optimization

496.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Inkitup.com main page is 616.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 326.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 68.6 kB

  • Original 84.9 kB
  • After minification 82.6 kB
  • After compression 16.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 326.3 kB
  • After minification 326.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Inkitup images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 45.4 kB

  • Original 157.5 kB
  • After minification 157.5 kB
  • After compression 112.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 45.4 kB or 29% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 6.3 kB

  • Original 47.7 kB
  • After minification 47.1 kB
  • After compression 41.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Inkitup.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.3 kB or 13% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (76%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Inkitup. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.inkitup.com

www.inkitup.com

247 ms

validationEngine.jquery.css

validationEngine.jquery.css

148 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

144 ms

styles.css

styles.css

160 ms

front-flex.min.css

front-flex.min.css

159 ms

testimonial-rotator-style.css

testimonial-rotator-style.css

151 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

41 ms

style.css

style.css

156 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

157 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

162 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

165 ms

jquery.cycletwo.js

jquery.cycletwo.js

176 ms

jquery.cycletwo.addons.js

jquery.cycletwo.addons.js

170 ms

custom.js

custom.js

229 ms

third-party.min.js

third-party.min.js

176 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

177 ms

jquery.flexslider.min.js

jquery.flexslider.min.js

182 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js

181 ms

general.min.js

general.min.js

198 ms

shortcodes.css

shortcodes.css

192 ms

custom.css

custom.css

192 ms

css

css

41 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

196 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

195 ms

index.js

index.js

210 ms

index.js

index.js

206 ms

morphext.min.js

morphext.min.js

214 ms

welcomebar-front.js

welcomebar-front.js

211 ms

detectmobilebrowser.js

detectmobilebrowser.js

213 ms

mystickymenu.min.js

mystickymenu.min.js

221 ms

styling.min.js

styling.min.js

226 ms

jquery.validationEngine-en.js

jquery.validationEngine-en.js

228 ms

jquery.validationEngine.js

jquery.validationEngine.js

230 ms

front-subscribers.js

front-subscribers.js

229 ms

style.css

style.css

86 ms

logo-inkitup.png

logo-inkitup.png

39 ms

slider11.jpg

slider11.jpg

35 ms

slider13.jpg

slider13.jpg

31 ms

icon-screenprinting-1.png

icon-screenprinting-1.png

31 ms

icon-embroidery-1.png

icon-embroidery-1.png

30 ms

icon-graphicdesign-1.png

icon-graphicdesign-1.png

32 ms

storefront-e1463774187798.jpeg

storefront-e1463774187798.jpeg

33 ms

btn-facebook.jpg

btn-facebook.jpg

33 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

48 ms

font

font

58 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

56 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

56 ms

font

font

57 ms

Accessibility Review

inkitup.com accessibility score

59

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<dl>'s do not contain only properly-ordered <dt> and <dd> groups, <script>, <template> or <div> elements.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

inkitup.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

inkitup.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inkitup.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Inkitup.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

inkitup.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Inkitup. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: