2.8 sec in total
914 ms
1.6 sec
261 ms
Click here to check amazing Internet Exposure content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about internet-exposure.com
Hire our internet marketing company in Vancouver at affordable rates. Look no more than us for an online marketing agency in Vancouver BC.
Visit internet-exposure.comWe analyzed Internet-exposure.com page load time and found that the first response time was 914 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
internet-exposure.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
11/100
10%
Value12.7 s
0/100
25%
Value10.6 s
7/100
10%
Value650 ms
46/100
30%
Value0.08
94/100
15%
Value11.8 s
17/100
10%
914 ms
82 ms
108 ms
34 ms
40 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Internet-exposure.com, 9% (7 requests) were made to Vcita.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (914 ms) belongs to the original domain Internet-exposure.com.
Page size can be reduced by 735.7 kB (34%)
2.1 MB
1.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Internet-exposure.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.9 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.3 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 54.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Internet Exposure images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 292.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 292.6 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 360.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Internet-exposure.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 360.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (20%)
71
57
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Internet Exposure. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
internet-exposure.com
914 ms
responsive-css.css
82 ms
style.css
108 ms
jquery.min.js
34 ms
misc.js
40 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
75 ms
validation.js
52 ms
captchavalid.js
23 ms
dc.js
30 ms
captcha.php
308 ms
livesite.js
93 ms
header-bg.jpg
52 ms
header-main-inner-bg.png
53 ms
logo-bg.png
60 ms
logo.png
62 ms
contact.png
54 ms
text-image.png
53 ms
fb-logo.png
55 ms
google-plus-logo.png
55 ms
home-img-over.png
56 ms
menu-li-bg.png
57 ms
services-img.png
58 ms
ppc-img.png
60 ms
seo-img.png
63 ms
web-design-img.png
62 ms
blog-articles-img.png
63 ms
hosting-img.png
62 ms
employment-img.png
62 ms
portfolio-img.png
67 ms
testimonials-img.png
81 ms
blog-img.png
83 ms
contact-img.png
82 ms
pull-btn.png
78 ms
banner-bg.png
125 ms
banner.png
294 ms
banner2.png
165 ms
banner3.png
208 ms
banner4.png
164 ms
banner5.png
286 ms
banner-bottom-bg.jpg
165 ms
tabs-bottom.png
208 ms
ppc-bg.jpg
208 ms
ppc-logo.png
207 ms
seo-bg.jpg
286 ms
seo-logo.png
211 ms
web-design-bg.jpg
211 ms
web-design-logo.png
210 ms
__utm.gif
16 ms
YKGRBsD4p2c
92 ms
blog-bg.jpg
244 ms
blog-logo.png
244 ms
partner-shadow.png
243 ms
form-bg.jpg
246 ms
submit.png
242 ms
google-partner-img.jpg
242 ms
bing-partner-img.jpg
242 ms
close-close.png
241 ms
opensans-regular_0-webfont.woff
241 ms
avgardn_0-webfont.woff
241 ms
livesite.css
26 ms
css
40 ms
configuration
50 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
33 ms
www-embed-player.js
47 ms
base.js
74 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
37 ms
ad_status.js
38 ms
CrYjSnGjrRCn0pd9VQsnFOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.woff
26 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUbO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
54 ms
pagination-active-bg.png
47 ms
active_engage_gate
39 ms
i
47 ms
pagination-bg.png
23 ms
left-arrow.png
17 ms
right-arrow.png
18 ms
avgardd_0-webfont.woff
17 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3bO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
4 ms
icomoon.woff
65 ms
active_engage_gate
117 ms
internet-exposure.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
internet-exposure.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
internet-exposure.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Internet-exposure.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Internet-exposure.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
internet-exposure.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Internet Exposure. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: