3.2 sec in total
591 ms
2.1 sec
527 ms
Welcome to internettranscribers.com homepage info - get ready to check Internet Transcribers best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about internettranscribers.com
Visit internettranscribers.comWe analyzed Internettranscribers.com page load time and found that the first response time was 591 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
internettranscribers.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.2 s
99/100
10%
Value3.9 s
54/100
25%
Value4.4 s
74/100
10%
Value150 ms
95/100
30%
Value0.172
69/100
15%
Value3.7 s
91/100
10%
591 ms
135 ms
86 ms
91 ms
231 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Internettranscribers.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Mobile.twitter.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Wd-edge.sharethis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (591 ms) belongs to the original domain Internettranscribers.com.
Page size can be reduced by 297.1 kB (33%)
899.3 kB
602.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Internettranscribers.com main page is 899.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 510.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.4 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Internet Transcribers images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 234.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 234.4 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 30.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Internettranscribers.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 30.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (64%)
39
14
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Internet Transcribers. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.internettranscribers.com
591 ms
style.css
135 ms
effects.css
86 ms
polls-css.css
91 ms
jquery.js
231 ms
hoverIntent.js
117 ms
commentluv.js
111 ms
tabs.js
158 ms
cufon-yui.js
196 ms
Qlassik.font.js
243 ms
general.js
195 ms
superfish.js
198 ms
cl_style.css
215 ms
dd-formmailer.css
248 ms
date_chooser.js
283 ms
buttons.js
7 ms
blue.css
248 ms
custom.css
289 ms
polls-js.js
291 ms
reset.css
192 ms
blogger.js
118 ms
woothemes.json
120 ms
bgoverlay.jpg
302 ms
header.jpg
233 ms
jim.jpg
141 ms
009_60.gif
139 ms
email.gif
140 ms
i_103.gif
138 ms
i_106.gif
188 ms
getAllAppDefault.esi
126 ms
getSegment.php
15 ms
checkOAuth.esi
7 ms
t.dhj
6 ms
t.dhj
11 ms
cm
28 ms
x35248
103 ms
s-3271.xgi
9 ms
hbpix
29 ms
21 ms
6 ms
pixel
18 ms
xrefid.xgi
5 ms
pixel
14 ms
2981
19 ms
internettranscribers.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
internettranscribers.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
internettranscribers.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Internettranscribers.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Internettranscribers.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
internettranscribers.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Internet Transcribers. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: