Tools & Wizards About Us
invoicefactoring.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 63

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

invoicefactoring.com

Invoice Factoring for Transportation

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

122 ms

Resources Loaded

634 ms

Page Rendered

816 ms

invoicefactoring.com screenshot

About Website

Visit invoicefactoring.com now to see the best up-to-date Invoice Factoring content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about invoicefactoring.com

Triumph, formerly Triumph Business Capital, provides invoice factoring for transportation, providing advances on your outstanding invoices. Get paid today!

Visit invoicefactoring.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Invoicefactoring.com page load time and found that the first response time was 122 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

invoicefactoring.com performance score

63

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

35/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

83/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value390 ms

69/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.5 s

71/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

invoicefactoring.com

122 ms

www.invoicefactoring.com

114 ms

www.invoicefactoring.com

151 ms

css2

50 ms

script.js

51 ms

Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (20 requests) were addressed to the original Invoicefactoring.com, 4% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Cdn-cookieyes.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (162 ms) relates to the external source Kit.fontawesome.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 53.9 kB (10%)

Content Size

523.3 kB

After Optimization

469.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Invoicefactoring.com main page is 523.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 276.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 53.4 kB

  • Original 68.0 kB
  • After minification 63.6 kB
  • After compression 14.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 276.6 kB
  • After minification 276.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Invoice Factoring images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 88 B

  • Original 144.6 kB
  • After minification 144.6 kB
  • After compression 144.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 328 B

  • Original 34.1 kB
  • After minification 34.1 kB
  • After compression 33.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Invoicefactoring.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (61%)

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Invoice Factoring. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

invoicefactoring.com

invoicefactoring.com

122 ms

www.invoicefactoring.com

www.invoicefactoring.com

114 ms

www.invoicefactoring.com

www.invoicefactoring.com

151 ms

css2

css2

50 ms

script.js

script.js

51 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

31 ms

style-min.css

style-min.css

84 ms

style-min.css

style-min.css

89 ms

style.css

style.css

46 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

91 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

48 ms

980c8433f1.js

980c8433f1.js

162 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

38 ms

script-min.js

script-min.js

161 ms

script-esm-min.js

script-esm-min.js

89 ms

script-min.js

script-min.js

158 ms

abl-bg.jpg

abl-bg.jpg

21 ms

benefit-2-1.jpg

benefit-2-1.jpg

23 ms

benefit-1-1.jpg

benefit-1-1.jpg

36 ms

freight-broker-1.jpg

freight-broker-1.jpg

18 ms

pattern.svg

pattern.svg

17 ms

Gotham-Book_Web.woff

Gotham-Book_Web.woff

29 ms

Gotham-Medium_Web.woff

Gotham-Medium_Web.woff

42 ms

Gotham-Bold_Web.woff

Gotham-Bold_Web.woff

73 ms

Accessibility Review

invoicefactoring.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

invoicefactoring.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

invoicefactoring.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Invoicefactoring.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Invoicefactoring.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

invoicefactoring.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Invoice Factoring. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: