3.6 sec in total
74 ms
2.7 sec
870 ms
Click here to check amazing Irp content for Chile. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about irp.cl
Resonancia magnetica, resonancia magnetica rodilla, tac, laboratorios medicos, laboratorio clinico, tomografía, ecocardiograma, Examenes Fonasa, Ecografía, Scanner
Visit irp.clWe analyzed Irp.cl page load time and found that the first response time was 74 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
irp.cl performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value16.5 s
0/100
25%
Value11.1 s
6/100
10%
Value1,490 ms
14/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value17.1 s
4/100
10%
74 ms
886 ms
74 ms
70 ms
47 ms
Our browser made a total of 108 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (91 requests) were addressed to the original Irp.cl, 8% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Irp.cl.
Page size can be reduced by 514.6 kB (12%)
4.2 MB
3.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Irp.cl main page is 4.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 349.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 349.2 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 165.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Irp images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 54 (57%)
95
41
The browser has sent 95 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Irp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
irp.cl
74 ms
irp.cl
886 ms
js
74 ms
public.css
70 ms
auto-generated-wptwa.css
47 ms
css
48 ms
style.min.css
61 ms
public.min.css
56 ms
css
64 ms
ladda.min.css
63 ms
tailwindreset.css
66 ms
tailwind.css
93 ms
bootstrap-icons.min.css
87 ms
intlTelInput.css
87 ms
bookly-main.css
90 ms
bootstrap.min.css
93 ms
customer-profile.css
89 ms
bootstrap.min.css
106 ms
template.min.css
112 ms
kl-bookly.css
110 ms
znb_frontend.css
121 ms
5553-layout.css
126 ms
zn_dynamic.css
123 ms
style.css
132 ms
airdatepicker.css
136 ms
jquery.min.js
136 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
158 ms
md5.js
160 ms
util.js
164 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
162 ms
public.min.js
165 ms
spin.min.js
172 ms
ladda.min.js
175 ms
moment.min.js
170 ms
hammer.min.js
181 ms
jquery.hammer.min.js
180 ms
qrcode.js
179 ms
bookly.min.js
186 ms
intlTelInput.min.js
152 ms
customer-profile.js
151 ms
style.basic-ho-is-po-no-da-se-co-au-ga-se-is.css
41 ms
933d922d94.js
140 ms
gtm.js
80 ms
sdk.js
70 ms
logo-irp-350.png
57 ms
logo-irp-feb-2023-rehecho.png
68 ms
QGY_z_wNahGAdqQ43RhVcIgYT2Xz5u32K0nXBi8Jow.ttf
218 ms
vEF72_JTCgwQ5ejvMV0Ox_Kg1UwJ0tKfX4zNpD8E4ASzH1r9gTuoyjkj.ttf
219 ms
icomoon.svg
683 ms
sdk.js
212 ms
public.js
162 ms
plugins.min.js
163 ms
scrollmagic.js
164 ms
znscript.min.js
163 ms
slick.min.js
162 ms
znpb_frontend.bundle.js
165 ms
lepopup.js
166 ms
airdatepicker.js
166 ms
asp-9557b422.js
166 ms
resonancia-magnetica-irp-providencia-2.png
167 ms
tac-scanner-irp-las-condes-1.png
168 ms
radiologia-irp-2.png
169 ms
doppler.png
169 ms
mamografia-1.png
170 ms
ecografia.png
170 ms
electrocardiograma-en-santiago-1.png
171 ms
laboratorio-clinico-1.png
176 ms
densitometria-box.png
172 ms
holter.png
174 ms
test-de-esfuerzo.png
173 ms
principal-irp.jpg
173 ms
fw-reserva-hora.jpg
175 ms
agendahora.png
176 ms
logo-clinicalplus.svg
176 ms
logos-acreditacion-irp-movil-1.png
178 ms
fondo-pc-2-1.jpg
179 ms
centro-medico-acreditado-irp-1.png
180 ms
fonasa-nivel-2-irp-santiago.png
178 ms
isapres-nivel-1-v2.png
181 ms
transbank-h-1-1.png
180 ms
instituto-radiologico-providencia-2.jpg
180 ms
te-llamamos-2.png
242 ms
cotizar-adjuntando-examen-1.png
181 ms
contactanos.png
181 ms
huella-digital-imed-002-750x350_c.jpg
89 ms
tac--370x400_c.jpg
86 ms
rx-radiografia-torax-370x400_c.jpg
89 ms
hemograma-370x400_c.jpg
85 ms
Imagen-de-WhatsApp-2023-08-01-a-las-11.36.32-370x400_c.jpg
85 ms
logo-irp-feb-2023-movil-350.png
85 ms
centro-medico-acreditado-irp-2.png
85 ms
webpay-blanco.png
84 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
41 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
127 ms
glyphicons_halflingsregular.woff
105 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
128 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVc.ttf
131 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
132 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
131 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
130 ms
kl-social-icons.woff
603 ms
email-decode.min.js
26 ms
loader.js
345 ms
main.js
30 ms
admin-ajax.php
1123 ms
admin-ajax.php
1122 ms
logo-green-small.png
24 ms
print.css
28 ms
irp.cl accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
irp.cl best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
irp.cl SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Irp.cl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Irp.cl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
irp.cl
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Irp. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: