2.2 sec in total
153 ms
1.5 sec
578 ms
Visit jaeroofing.com now to see the best up-to-date JAE Roofing content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jaeroofing.com
At James A. Edgar Roofing, we know commercial roofing. We are experts in Commercial, Industrial or Municipal roof servicing, restoration and replacement.
Visit jaeroofing.comWe analyzed Jaeroofing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 153 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
jaeroofing.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
27/100
10%
Value15.4 s
0/100
25%
Value6.4 s
40/100
10%
Value3,310 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.064
97/100
15%
Value16.0 s
6/100
10%
153 ms
332 ms
192 ms
234 ms
174 ms
Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Jaeroofing.com, 78% (40 requests) were made to H687ba.p3cdn1.secureserver.net and 12% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (743 ms) relates to the external source H687ba.p3cdn1.secureserver.net.
Page size can be reduced by 61.2 kB (3%)
2.2 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Jaeroofing.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 59.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. JAE Roofing images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 512 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jaeroofing.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (68%)
41
13
The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JAE Roofing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jaeroofing.com
153 ms
jaeroofing.com
332 ms
style.min.css
192 ms
style-coblocks-1.css
234 ms
style-coblocks-extensions.css
174 ms
style-coblocks-animation.css
467 ms
style.min.css
283 ms
latest.css
402 ms
bootstrap.min.css
415 ms
font-sizes.min.css
285 ms
style.min.css
338 ms
css
36 ms
jquery.min.js
342 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
335 ms
aos.min.js
389 ms
all.min.css
516 ms
wpforms-full.min.css
511 ms
coblocks-animation.js
526 ms
tiny-swiper.js
527 ms
coblocks-tinyswiper-initializer.js
526 ms
comment-reply.min.js
738 ms
bootstrap.min.js
557 ms
core.min.js
554 ms
script.min.js
600 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
557 ms
jquery.inputmask.min.js
622 ms
mailcheck.min.js
641 ms
punycode.min.js
643 ms
utils.min.js
642 ms
wpforms.min.js
743 ms
api.js
35 ms
JAE_SmallLogo4_2.png
479 ms
JAERoofing_005-scaled.jpg
201 ms
isn-member-contractor-150x150.jpg
272 ms
avetta-member-150x150.png
199 ms
ABC-STEP-Diamond-300x205.jpg
294 ms
BASF2-300x150.png
295 ms
Barrett.png
295 ms
Pac-Clad-300x99.jpg
515 ms
Carlisle-FoamCoatings-300x62.png
359 ms
Metal-Era_Logo_PNG-300x59.png
408 ms
JAERoofing_001-scaled.jpg
498 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu7GxP.ttf
37 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fChc9.ttf
48 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fChc9.ttf
61 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfChc9.ttf
73 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjojISmYWRm.ttf
73 ms
BngbUXZYTXPIvIBgJJSb6s3BzlRRfKOFbvjoa4OmYWRm.ttf
74 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
329 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
387 ms
recaptcha__en.js
80 ms
jaeroofing.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
jaeroofing.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
jaeroofing.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jaeroofing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jaeroofing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jaeroofing.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of JAE Roofing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: