Tools & Wizards About Us
jamailsmith.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

jamailsmith.com

Jamail & Smith Construction, Job Order Contractor

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

42 ms

Resources Loaded

901 ms

Page Rendered

314 ms

jamailsmith.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to jamailsmith.com homepage info - get ready to check Jamail Smith best content right away, or after learning these important things about jamailsmith.com

Jamail & Smith delivers results your clients will love by completing a project on schedule and within budget, fulfilling all specifications and

Visit jamailsmith.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jamailsmith.com page load time and found that the first response time was 42 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jamailsmith.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

54/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.3 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,890 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.065

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.4 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jamailsmith.com

42 ms

jamailsmith.com

214 ms

style.min.css

26 ms

latest.css

31 ms

frontend.min.css

31 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Jamailsmith.com, 8% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (330 ms) belongs to the original domain Jamailsmith.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 142.5 kB (22%)

Content Size

654.8 kB

After Optimization

512.3 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Jamailsmith.com main page is 654.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 358.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 132.7 kB

  • Original 160.5 kB
  • After minification 155.6 kB
  • After compression 27.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 132.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 338 B

  • Original 358.7 kB
  • After minification 358.7 kB
  • After compression 358.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 9.4 kB

  • Original 135.6 kB
  • After minification 135.2 kB
  • After compression 126.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jamailsmith.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (91%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jamail Smith. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 31 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

jamailsmith.com

jamailsmith.com

42 ms

jamailsmith.com

jamailsmith.com

214 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

26 ms

latest.css

latest.css

31 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

31 ms

widget-image.min.css

widget-image.min.css

34 ms

widget-text-editor.min.css

widget-text-editor.min.css

34 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

34 ms

widget-social-icons.min.css

widget-social-icons.min.css

44 ms

apple-webkit.min.css

apple-webkit.min.css

39 ms

widget-heading.min.css

widget-heading.min.css

38 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

40 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

52 ms

e-swiper.min.css

e-swiper.min.css

45 ms

post-20801.css

post-20801.css

49 ms

frontend.min.css

frontend.min.css

47 ms

fadeInUp.min.css

fadeInUp.min.css

50 ms

widget-divider.min.css

widget-divider.min.css

56 ms

widget-spacer.min.css

widget-spacer.min.css

54 ms

fadeInLeft.min.css

fadeInLeft.min.css

55 ms

fadeInRight.min.css

fadeInRight.min.css

57 ms

zoomIn.min.css

zoomIn.min.css

59 ms

post-5489.css

post-5489.css

61 ms

post-26599.css

post-26599.css

69 ms

style.css

style.css

82 ms

style.css

style.css

68 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

65 ms

css

css

51 ms

css

css

69 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

71 ms

brands.min.css

brands.min.css

76 ms

external-permalinks.js

external-permalinks.js

103 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

104 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

118 ms

js

js

76 ms

css

css

77 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

206 ms

coblocks-animation.js

coblocks-animation.js

206 ms

tiny-swiper.js

tiny-swiper.js

229 ms

coblocks-tinyswiper-initializer.js

coblocks-tinyswiper-initializer.js

206 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

231 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

230 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

330 ms

modernizr-custom.js

modernizr-custom.js

321 ms

plugins-full.js

plugins-full.js

322 ms

app.js

app.js

322 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

209 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

321 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

319 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

319 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

320 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

314 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

316 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

310 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

310 ms

JSLogoColor-copy.png

JSLogoColor-copy.png

154 ms

JSLogoWhite-copy.png

JSLogoWhite-copy.png

155 ms

JSLogoColor.png

JSLogoColor.png

152 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

130 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf

188 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEA.ttf

277 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf

279 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf

280 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

152 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

253 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

236 ms

Accessibility Review

jamailsmith.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

jamailsmith.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

jamailsmith.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jamailsmith.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jamailsmith.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jamailsmith.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jamail Smith. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: