Report Summary

  • 70

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 77% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

jimsorkin.com

jimsorkin construction

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

294 ms

Resources Loaded

760 ms

Page Rendered

231 ms

jimsorkin.com screenshot

About Website

Visit jimsorkin.com now to see the best up-to-date Jimsorkin content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jimsorkin.com

Check out http://jimsorkin.com! Home Page

Visit jimsorkin.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jimsorkin.com page load time and found that the first response time was 294 ms and then it took 991 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jimsorkin.com performance score

70

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.1 s

99/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

36/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

82/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value400 ms

68/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.0 s

77/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jimsorkin.com

294 ms

layout1.css

182 ms

theme.css

232 ms

color_1.css

159 ms

custom.css

207 ms

Our browser made a total of 10 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Jimsorkin.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (294 ms) belongs to the original domain Jimsorkin.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 15.2 kB (19%)

Content Size

79.3 kB

After Optimization

64.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Jimsorkin.com main page is 79.3 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 60.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 4.4 kB

  • Original 6.1 kB
  • After minification 5.1 kB
  • After compression 1.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.0 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.4 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 78 B

  • Original 60.7 kB
  • After minification 60.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jimsorkin images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 10.8 kB

  • Original 12.5 kB
  • After minification 5.0 kB
  • After compression 1.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jimsorkin.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (33%)

Requests Now

9

After Optimization

6

The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jimsorkin. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

jimsorkin.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

jimsorkin.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

jimsorkin.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jimsorkin.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jimsorkin.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jimsorkin. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: