Tools & Wizards About Us
jindalcoaters.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 37

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

jindalcoaters.com

Synthetic Leather India | Manufacturer and Exporter of Synthetic Leather Indian | PVC and PU Products Manufacturer Indian | Non Woven India | Button E...

Page Load Speed

5.8 sec in total

First Response

832 ms

Resources Loaded

4.8 sec

Page Rendered

184 ms

jindalcoaters.com screenshot

About Website

Visit jindalcoaters.com now to see the best up-to-date Jindalcoaters content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jindalcoaters.com

United Decoratives private limited (Jindalcoaters) is the leading manufaturer of synthetic leather , Polyester Buttons , non woven fabric.

Visit jindalcoaters.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jindalcoaters.com page load time and found that the first response time was 832 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jindalcoaters.com performance score

37

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.3 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.2 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value350 ms

73/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.047

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.6 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jindalcoaters.com

832 ms

www.jindalcoaters.com

584 ms

css

24 ms

font-awesome.min.css

512 ms

bootstrap.min.css

1436 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Jindalcoaters.com, 8% (6 requests) were made to Keenthemes.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Jindalcoaters.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (61%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

796.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Jindalcoaters.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 952.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 35.7 kB

  • Original 44.2 kB
  • After minification 36.7 kB
  • After compression 8.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 7.4 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.7 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 71.9 kB

  • Original 627.9 kB
  • After minification 556.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Jindalcoaters needs image optimization as it can save up to 71.9 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 292.2 kB

  • Original 418.7 kB
  • After minification 405.0 kB
  • After compression 126.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 292.2 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 847.0 kB

  • Original 952.3 kB
  • After minification 698.0 kB
  • After compression 105.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jindalcoaters.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 847.0 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (57%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jindalcoaters. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

jindalcoaters.com

jindalcoaters.com

832 ms

www.jindalcoaters.com

www.jindalcoaters.com

584 ms

css

css

24 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

512 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

1436 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

jquery.fancybox.css

509 ms

owl.carousel.css

owl.carousel.css

494 ms

settings.css

settings.css

1047 ms

components.css

components.css

1496 ms

style.css

style.css

1228 ms

style-revolution-slider.css

style-revolution-slider.css

762 ms

gallery.css

gallery.css

778 ms

style-responsive.css

style-responsive.css

1002 ms

red.css

red.css

1044 ms

custom.css

custom.css

1237 ms

style.css

style.css

2050 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

1279 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

1701 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

1469 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

1518 ms

back-to-top.js

back-to-top.js

1671 ms

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

jquery.fancybox.pack.js

1705 ms

owl.carousel.min.js

owl.carousel.min.js

1798 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

1996 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

1922 ms

revo-slider-init.js

revo-slider-init.js

1967 ms

layout.js

layout.js

1982 ms

common.js

common.js

2068 ms

element.js

element.js

52 ms

5852061.jpg

5852061.jpg

290 ms

logo.png

logo.png

272 ms

c1.jpg

c1.jpg

272 ms

LOGO.png

LOGO.png

271 ms

a1.jpg

a1.jpg

272 ms

car2.png

car2.png

271 ms

p2.jpg

p2.jpg

524 ms

sofa1.png

sofa1.png

500 ms

timer.png

timer.png

469 ms

bgfooter.jpg

bgfooter.jpg

497 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

97 ms

fontawesome-webfontf77b.woff

fontawesome-webfontf77b.woff

480 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

245 ms

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Regular-webfont.woff

414 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf

63 ms

OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Semibold-webfont.woff

619 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf

64 ms

OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff

641 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf

64 ms

OpenSans-Bold-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Bold-webfont.woff

627 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf

65 ms

OpenSans-ExtraBold-webfont.woff

OpenSans-ExtraBold-webfont.woff

655 ms

OpenSans-Italic-webfont.woff

OpenSans-Italic-webfont.woff

653 ms

OpenSans-SemiboldItalic-webfont.woff

OpenSans-SemiboldItalic-webfont.woff

668 ms

OpenSans-LightItalic-webfont.woff

OpenSans-LightItalic-webfont.woff

921 ms

OpenSans-BoldItalic-webfont.woff

OpenSans-BoldItalic-webfont.woff

930 ms

OpenSans-ExtraBoldItalic-webfont.woff

OpenSans-ExtraBoldItalic-webfont.woff

931 ms

Roboto-Bold.woff

Roboto-Bold.woff

930 ms

Roboto-Regular.woff

Roboto-Regular.woff

930 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

27 ms

up.png

up.png

854 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

1106 ms

shadow1.png

shadow1.png

1099 ms

large_left.png

large_left.png

1100 ms

large_right.png

large_right.png

1102 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

17 ms

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html

87 ms

80 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

398 ms

settings

settings

102 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

81 ms

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

fontawesome-webfont.ttf

126 ms

fontawesome-webfont.svg

fontawesome-webfont.svg

79 ms

fontawesome-webfont.svg

fontawesome-webfont.svg

134 ms

thumb2.jpg

thumb2.jpg

279 ms

Accessibility Review

jindalcoaters.com accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

jindalcoaters.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

jindalcoaters.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jindalcoaters.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jindalcoaters.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jindalcoaters.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jindalcoaters. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: