4.7 sec in total
1.6 sec
2.8 sec
332 ms
Visit jl.design now to see the best up-to-date JL content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jl.design
Back to basic: ask the right question, tell a good story.
Visit jl.designWe analyzed Jl.design page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
jl.design performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.9 s
88/100
10%
Value2.0 s
96/100
25%
Value11.6 s
4/100
10%
Value2,240 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.002
100/100
15%
Value10.0 s
26/100
10%
1552 ms
150 ms
10 ms
328 ms
454 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Jl.design, 17% (15 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 8% (7 requests) were made to Maps.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Jl.design.
Page size can be reduced by 896.2 kB (16%)
5.7 MB
4.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Jl.design main page is 5.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 65.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 71.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. JL images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 665.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 665.0 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 95.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jl.design needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 95.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (34%)
79
52
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JL. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jl.design
1552 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.min.css
150 ms
font-awesome.css
10 ms
jquery-1.9.1.min.js
328 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.3.custom.min.js
454 ms
jquery.transit.min.js
144 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
208 ms
detectmobilebrowser.js
145 ms
js
24 ms
css
26 ms
style.css
280 ms
jquery.js
422 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
219 ms
external-tracking.min.js
275 ms
style.css
285 ms
navigation.js
339 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
70 ms
analytics.js
8 ms
2013_CCTV_id_b.jpg
204 ms
2015_CCTV_Image_img5_banner.jpg
206 ms
2015_CCTV_LogoAnimation_img2_banner.jpg
200 ms
2014_disney_junior_beach_banner.jpg
201 ms
2014_QQ_closer_tb3_1.jpg
203 ms
close.png
102 ms
logo.svg
103 ms
search.png
102 ms
0307_WDC_LogoAnimation_banner01.jpg
248 ms
ZJSTV_65sec_homepage_banner011.jpg
413 ms
151216_goldenpin_opening_banner_img02.jpg
320 ms
2015_FOX_Classics_main_banner01.jpg
394 ms
banner_1610x670.jpg
527 ms
HBTV_logo_banner_2.jpg
248 ms
HBTV2015_imgae_banner_2.jpg
401 ms
2015_FOX_Classics_tb03.jpg
285 ms
ZJSTV_65sec_tb02_2.jpg
348 ms
0307_WDC_LogoAnimation_img002_tb1.jpg
376 ms
160118_cnex_packaging_img1_tb1.jpg
453 ms
Fox_2015_ACTION_tb1.jpg
452 ms
Fox_2015_ROMANCE_tb1.jpg
462 ms
151216_goldenpin_tb03.jpg
475 ms
Fox_2015_SUSPENSE_tb2.jpg
483 ms
151224_goldenpin_tb011.jpg
521 ms
preloader.gif
522 ms
linkid.js
21 ms
DINWeb-Light.woff
502 ms
DINWeb.woff
514 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
5 ms
DINWeb-Medium.woff
526 ms
DINWeb-Bold.woff
554 ms
collect
57 ms
collect
83 ms
common.js
33 ms
map.js
34 ms
util.js
34 ms
marker.js
34 ms
ic_facebook.png
492 ms
ic_youtube.png
502 ms
ic_vimeo.png
509 ms
ic_twitter.png
514 ms
ic_youku.png
529 ms
ic_weibo.png
561 ms
ui-bg_flat_75_ffffff_40x100.png
563 ms
onion.js
33 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
43 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
65 ms
stats.js
19 ms
controls.js
16 ms
2015_CCTV_LogoAnimation_img2_banner.jpg
533 ms
2014_disney_junior_beach_banner.jpg
487 ms
2013_CCTV_id_b.jpg
552 ms
2014_QQ_closer_tb3_1.jpg
496 ms
2015_CCTV_Image_img5_banner.jpg
530 ms
transparent.png
27 ms
css
20 ms
google4.png
28 ms
point.png
452 ms
mapcnt6.png
26 ms
sv5.png
26 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
15 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
27 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
27 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
27 ms
vt
53 ms
vt
59 ms
tmapctrl4.png
17 ms
google_white5.png
16 ms
vt
65 ms
vt
52 ms
vt
57 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
45 ms
jl.design accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
jl.design best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
jl.design SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
ZH
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jl.design can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Chinese language. Our system also found out that Jl.design main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jl.design
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of JL. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: