1.1 sec in total
100 ms
990 ms
57 ms
Visit jmscientific.com now to see the best up-to-date JM Scientific content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about jmscientific.com
Visit jmscientific.comWe analyzed Jmscientific.com page load time and found that the first response time was 100 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
jmscientific.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
61/100
10%
Value7.3 s
5/100
25%
Value8.8 s
16/100
10%
Value270 ms
81/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value12.7 s
13/100
10%
100 ms
31 ms
29 ms
29 ms
112 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Jmscientific.com, 38% (15 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 30% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (610 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 735.5 kB (63%)
1.2 MB
430.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Jmscientific.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 842.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 687.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 687.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. JM Scientific images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 48.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 16% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (28%)
36
26
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of JM Scientific. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.jmscientific.com
100 ms
minified.js
31 ms
focus-within-polyfill.js
29 ms
polyfill.min.js
29 ms
thunderbolt-commons.a989d465.bundle.min.js
112 ms
main.9a8f299d.bundle.min.js
122 ms
main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js
111 ms
lodash.min.js
112 ms
react.production.min.js
122 ms
react-dom.production.min.js
123 ms
siteTags.bundle.min.js
123 ms
395138_533336056695650_1745031830_n%20(2).jpg
272 ms
bundle.min.js
53 ms
2bb9e75bc3224cf4b3314fa0e01af8a7.jpg
348 ms
4c0e53_261090f944e84bc6814cc31a6064975b~mv2.jpg
418 ms
4c0e53_df5e85154ff0498cac7ae49b8225a820~mv2.jpg
503 ms
4c0e53_c4b549e4cc8a44e79a97ff2f8706dde1~mv2.jpg
421 ms
4c0e53_84ef5fb2c59143f7ab967de0f585e10f~mv2.jpg
478 ms
4c0e53_76ac4fce34a94fbe937429a622a34d19~mv2.jpg
384 ms
2bb9e75bc3224cf4b3314fa0e01af8a7.jpg
481 ms
4c0e53_4fcdc96719c74807b04981deadb999ab~mv2.jpg
610 ms
98 ms
92 ms
93 ms
93 ms
90 ms
92 ms
127 ms
131 ms
129 ms
127 ms
126 ms
126 ms
deprecation-en.v5.html
5 ms
bolt-performance
22 ms
deprecation-style.v5.css
5 ms
right-arrow.svg
15 ms
WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff
5 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff
5 ms
WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff
5 ms
jmscientific.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
jmscientific.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
jmscientific.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jmscientific.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jmscientific.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jmscientific.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of JM Scientific. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: